Karen Batres-de Zuniga v. Merrick Garland
KAREN BEATRIZ BATRES-DE ZUNIGA and J.A.Z.D. |
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General |
23-2264 |
December 7, 2023 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 7, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL by Craig W. Kuhn for Merrick B. Garland. [1001485747] [23-2264] Craig Kuhn [Entered: 12/07/2023 03:14 PM] |
Filing 6 NOTICE ISSUED serving respondent and requesting record. Date petition for review [ # 2 ] filed: December 6, 2023. [1001485317] Administrative Record due 01/16/2024. [23-2264] KS [Entered: 12/07/2023 09:48 AM] |
Filing 5 DOCKETING NOTICE issued Re: [ # 2 ] petition for review. Originating case numbers: A249-096-020, A249-096-021. [1001485315] [23-2264] KS [Entered: 12/07/2023 09:46 AM] |
Immigration Petition for Review case docketed. Originating case numbers: A249-096-020, A249-096-021. Case manager: KStump. [1001485300] [23-2264] KS [Entered: 12/07/2023 09:39 AM] |
Filing 4 APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL by Mariana Beatriz Viera Lugo for Karen Beatriz Batres-de Zuniga and J.A.Z.D. [1001485313] [23-2264] KS [Entered: 12/07/2023 09:45 AM] |
Filing 3 APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL by Jay S. Marks for Karen Beatriz Batres-de Zuniga and J.A.Z.D. [1001485312] [23-2264] KS [Entered: 12/07/2023 09:44 AM] |
Filing 2 Petition for review of agency order filed by Karen Beatriz Batres-de Zuniga and J.A.Z.D. [1001485309] [23-2264] KS [Entered: 12/07/2023 09:43 AM] |
Filing 1 Electronic filing fee paid. Filing Fee: $600.00. Receipt Number: B04-74751-245. [1001485308] [23-2264] KS [Entered: 12/07/2023 09:42 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.