In re: Kenneth Reid
Petitioner: In re: KENNETH ROSHAUN REID
Case Number: 23-262
Filed: September 28, 2023
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 28, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 28, 2023 Filing 3 DOCKETING NOTICE issued Re: [ # 2 ] Motion for authorization to file successive habeas application (Local Rule 22(d)). Originating case number: 0:04-cr-00353-CMC-1. Mailed to: Kenneth Reid, Jimmie Ewing. [1001447495] [23-262] KH [Entered: 09/28/2023 04:38 PM]
September 28, 2023 Filing 2 Motion for authorization to file successive application for post-conviction relief (Local Rule 22(d)) filed by Kenneth Roshaun Reid. Are PSR & SOR available on district court docket? Y. Has sentencing transcript been prepared? Y. [1001447492] [23-262] KH [Entered: 09/28/2023 04:36 PM]
September 28, 2023 Filing 1 2244 case docketed. Originating case number: 0:04-cr-00353-CMC-1. Case manager: KHancock. [1001447491] [23-262] KH [Entered: 09/28/2023 04:35 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: In re: Kenneth Reid
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: In re: KENNETH ROSHAUN REID
Represented By: Kenneth Roshaun Reid
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?