In re: Kenneth Reid
In re: KENNETH ROSHAUN REID |
23-287 |
November 13, 2023 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 13, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 Attorney Jimmie Ewing for US in 23-287 terminated from case. Reason for termination: Not participating. [1001472652] [23-287] NRS [Entered: 11/13/2023 04:39 PM] |
Filing 3 DOCKETING NOTICE issued Re: [1] 2244 case. Originating case number: 0:04-cr-00353-CMC-1. Mailed to: Kenneth Roshaun Reid, #11485-171, UNITED STATES PENITENTIARY CANAAN, P. O. Box 300, Waymart, PA 18472-0000. [1001472650] [23-287] NRS [Entered: 11/13/2023 04:38 PM] |
Filing 2 Motion for authorization to file successive application for post-conviction relief (Local Rule 22(d)) filed by Kenneth Roshaun Reid. Are PSR & SOR available on district court docket? Y. Has sentencing transcript been prepared? Y. [1001472623] [23-287] NRS [Entered: 11/13/2023 04:27 PM] |
Filing 1 2244 case docketed. Originating case number: 0:04-cr-00353-CMC-1. Case manager: NaeemahSims. [1001472607] [23-287] NRS [Entered: 11/13/2023 04:21 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: In re: Kenneth Reid | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: In re: KENNETH ROSHAUN REID | |
Represented By: | Kenneth Roshaun Reid |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.