In re: Donald Vaughn
| In re: DONALD VAUGHN, a/k/a Donald Doc Vaughan |
| 23-305 |
| December 18, 2023 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 18, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 DOCKETING NOTICE issued Re: [ # 2 ] Motion for authorization to file successive habeas application (Local Rule 22(d)). Mailed to: Donald Vaughn, #368231, NORTH BRANCH CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION, 14100 McMullen Highway, SW, Cumberland, MD 21502; Anthony G. Brown, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, 200 Saint Paul Place, Baltimore, MD 21202-0000. [1001491145] [23-305] KS [Entered: 12/18/2023 03:58 PM] |
| Filing 2 Motion for authorization to file successive application for post-conviction relief (Local Rule 22(d)) filed by Donald Vaughn. Are PSR & SOR available on district court docket? NA. Has sentencing transcript been prepared? NA. [1001491142] [23-305] KS [Entered: 12/18/2023 03:57 PM] |
| Filing 1 2244 case docketed. Case manager: KStump. [1001491134] [23-305] KS [Entered: 12/18/2023 03:54 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: In re: Donald Vaughn | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: In re: DONALD VAUGHN, a/k/a Donald Doc Vaughan | |
| Represented By: | Donald Vaughn |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
