US v. Mickael Davis
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
| MICKAEL JAQUAN DAVIS |
| 23-4669 |
| November 1, 2023 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 2, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 2 APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL by David A. Bragdon for US. [1001466579] [23-4669] David Bragdon [Entered: 11/02/2023 12:07 PM] |
| Filing 1 Criminal case docketed. Originating case number: 5:21-cr-00297-D-1. Date notice of appeal filed: 10/30/2023. Case manager: TBarton. [1001466001] [23-4669] TB [Entered: 11/01/2023 03:30 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: US v. Mickael Davis | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff / appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA | |
| Represented By: | David A. Bragdon |
| Represented By: | John Parks Newby |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellant: MICKAEL JAQUAN DAVIS | |
| Represented By: | Scott L. Wilkinson Esq. |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
