US v. Bisheem Jones
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
BISHEEM JONES, a/k/a Bosh |
23-4711 |
November 29, 2023 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 29, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 3 DOCKETING NOTICE issued Re: [ # 1 ] criminal case. Originating case number: 5:22-cr-00046-1. [1001481081] [23-4711] KS [Entered: 11/29/2023 02:59 PM] |
![]() |
Filing 1 Criminal case docketed. Originating case number: 5:22-cr-00046-1. Date notice of appeal filed: 11/21/2023. Case manager: KStump. [1001481027] [23-4711] KS [Entered: 11/29/2023 02:33 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: US v. Bisheem Jones | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff / appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA | |
Represented By: | Negar M. Kordestani |
Represented By: | Steven Loew |
Represented By: | Brian Duran Parsons |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant / appellant: BISHEEM JONES, a/k/a Bosh | |
Represented By: | Brian David Yost |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.