Dena Minton v. Miranda Richardson
| DENA INEZ MINTON |
| MIRANDA B. RICHARDSON |
| 23-6010 |
| January 5, 2023 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit |
| Habeas Corpus |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
| Dena Minton v. Miranda Richardson |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 28, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 13
ORDER filed granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis [12]. Copies to all parties. Mailed to: Dena Minton. [1001323654] [23-6010] RE [Entered: 02/28/2023 09:45 AM]
|
| Filing 12 IFP-APPLICATION to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24)(court access only) by Dena Inez Minton. [1001323651] [23-6010] RE [Entered: 02/28/2023 09:45 AM] |
| Filing 11 INFORMAL OPENING BRIEF by Dena Inez Minton. [1001323650] [23-6010] RE [Entered: 02/28/2023 09:44 AM] |
| Filing 10 RULE 45 NOTICE issued to Dena Inez Minton re: failure to satisfy fee requirements. Mailed to: Dena Minton. [1001314879] [23-6010] RE [Entered: 02/13/2023 09:59 AM] |
| Filing 9 Exhibit(s) [ # 7 ] informal opening brief by Dena Inez Minton. [1001296116] [23-6010] RE [Entered: 01/10/2023 10:43 AM] |
| Filing 8 RESTRICTED ACCESS DOCUMENT (court & party access only) filed by Dena Inez Minton. Document Title: Portion of Exhibit NO. 7 that contains a psychological evaluation. Full document restriction required due to: sealed case documents . [1001296112] [23-6010] RE [Entered: 01/10/2023 10:42 AM] |
| Filing 7 INFORMAL OPENING BRIEF, titled as : "Request for Certificate of Appealability" by Dena Inez Minton. [1001296108] [23-6010] RE [Entered: 01/10/2023 10:41 AM] |
| Filing 6 Returned mail received from Dena Inez Minton re [ # 3 ] briefing order. What action was taken to correct address and re-serve document? No action taken, this is the address on file. In addition a request of COA was filed by the appellant separately. [1001296102] [23-6010] RE [Entered: 01/10/2023 10:40 AM] |
| Filing 4 RECORD requested from Clerk of Court [1001293926]. Due: 01/19/2023. [23-6010] RE [Entered: 01/05/2023 02:03 PM] |
| Filing 3 INFORMAL PRELIMINARY BRIEFING ORDER filed. Mailed to: Dena Minton. [1001293920] Informal Opening Brief due 01/30/2023 [23-6010] RE [Entered: 01/05/2023 02:00 PM] |
| Filing 2 FEE NOTICE issued to Dena Inez Minton - initial notice. Fee or application to proceed as indigent due 02/06/2023 Originating case number: 1:21-cv-00806-TDS-JEP. Mailed to: Dena Minton. [1001293918] [23-6010] RE [Entered: 01/05/2023 01:58 PM] |
| Filing 1 Habeas corpus appeal docketed. Originating case number: 1:21-cv-00806-TDS-JEP. Date notice of appeal filed: 01/03/2022. Case manager: REdwards. Did district court rule on COA? Yes. [1001293909] [23-6010] RE [Entered: 01/05/2023 01:52 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Dena Minton v. Miranda Richardson | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner / appellant: DENA INEZ MINTON | |
| Represented By: | Dena Inez Minton |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent / appellee: MIRANDA B. RICHARDSON | |
| Represented By: | Sherri Horner Lawrence |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
