Elbert Smith v. Michael Pauley
| ELBERT SMITH |
| SERGEANT MICHAEL PAULEY, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER S. SMITH, Property Officer, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER CUYKINDALL, Property Officer, WARDEN KARL MANIS and MARCUS ELAM, Regional Administrator for the Western Region Office |
| 23-6199 |
| March 3, 2023 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit |
| Prisoner - Civil Rights |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 29, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 Rule 42(b) mandate issued. Originating case number: 7:21-cv-00457-TTC-RSB. Mailed to: Smith. [1001339966] [23-6199] AW [Entered: 03/29/2023 09:48 AM] |
Filing 6
ORDER filed granting Motion to dismiss appeal pursuant to FRAP 42(b) [ # 5 ] Copies to all parties. Mailed to: Smith. [1001339962] [23-6199] AW [Entered: 03/29/2023 09:47 AM]
|
| Filing 5 MOTION by Elbert Smith to dismiss appeal pursuant to FRAP 42(b) [5]. [1001339960] [23-6199] AW [Entered: 03/29/2023 09:46 AM] |
| Filing 4 RECORD requested from Clerk of Court [1001325764]. Due: 03/17/2023. [23-6199] AW [Entered: 03/03/2023 09:16 AM] |
| Filing 3 INFORMAL BRIEFING ORDER filed. Mailed to: Smith. [1001325759] Informal Opening Brief due 03/27/2023 Informal response brief, if any: 14 days after informal opening brief served. [23-6199] AW [Entered: 03/03/2023 09:15 AM] |
| Filing 2 PLRA NOTICE issued to [ Elbert Smith ]. Fee due to District Court or PLRA application due to Court of Appeals within 15 days. Mailed to: Smith. [1001325757] [23-6199] AW [Entered: 03/03/2023 09:14 AM] |
| Filing 1 Case docketed. Originating case number: 7:21-cv-00457-TTC-RSB. Case manager: AWalker. [1001325750] [23-6199] AW [Entered: 03/03/2023 09:10 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.