Vander Davis v. Maryland Parole Commission
| WCI PAROLE ASSOCIATION |
| VANDER DAVIS |
| MARYLAND PAROLE COMMISSION, MYA COLLINS, Parole Officer, DAVID LAW, Parole Officer and MICHAEL NINES |
| 23-6239 |
| March 14, 2023 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit |
| Prisoner - Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 3, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 INFORMAL OPENING BRIEF by Vander Davis. [1001360914] [23-6239] MEB [Entered: 05/03/2023 01:10 PM] |
| Filing 6 PLRA/IFP-TRUST ACCOUNT STATEMENT (court access only) by Vander Davis. [1001355862] [23-6239] MEB [Entered: 04/25/2023 02:46 PM] |
| Filing 5 RULE 45 NOTICE issued to Vander Davis re: for failure to satisfy PLRA and informal briefing requirements. Case will be dismissed if default is not cured within 15 days. Mailed to: Vander Davis. [1001347775] [23-6239] MEB [Entered: 04/11/2023 03:56 PM] |
| Filing 4 RECORD requested from Clerk of Court [1001331545]. Due: 03/28/2023. [23-6239] MEB [Entered: 03/14/2023 01:55 PM] |
| Filing 3 INFORMAL BRIEFING ORDER filed. Mailed to: Vander Davis. [1001331542] Informal Opening Brief due 04/07/2023. Informal response brief, if any: 14 days after informal opening brief served. [23-6239] MEB [Entered: 03/14/2023 01:53 PM] |
| Filing 2 PLRA NOTICE issued to [ Vander Davis ]. Fee due to District Court or PLRA application due to Court of Appeals within 15 days. Mailed to: Vander Davis. [1001331537] [23-6239] MEB [Entered: 03/14/2023 01:52 PM] |
| Filing 1 Case docketed. Originating case number: 1:21-cv-03164-ELH. Case manager: MBeall. [1001331381] [23-6239] MEB [Entered: 03/14/2023 12:22 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
