James Rose, Jr. v. Randy Demory
Respondent: STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA, HONORABLE D. L. JEFFERSON and SHERIFF DUANE LEWIS
Petitioner / Appellant: JAMES EDWARD ROSE, JR.
Respondent / Appellee: RANDY DEMORY, Director Hill-Finklea Detention Center
Case Number: 23-6309
Filed: March 30, 2023
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
June 27, 2023 James Rose, Jr. v. Randy Demory

Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 20, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 20, 2023 Filing 7 INFORMAL OPENING BRIEF by James Edward Rose, Jr.. [1001353116] [23-6309] AW [Entered: 04/20/2023 12:40 PM]
April 20, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER filed granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis [5] Copies to all parties. Mailed to: Rose. [1001353099] [23-6309] AW [Entered: 04/20/2023 12:33 PM]
April 20, 2023 Filing 5 IFP-APPLICATION to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24)(court access only) by James Edward Rose, Jr.. [1001353098] [23-6309] AW [Entered: 04/20/2023 12:32 PM]
March 30, 2023 Filing 4 RECORD requested from Clerk of Court [1001340851]. Due: 04/13/2023. [23-6309] AW [Entered: 03/30/2023 11:38 AM]
March 30, 2023 Filing 3 INFORMAL PRELIMINARY BRIEFING ORDER filed. Mailed to: Rose. [1001340848] Informal Opening Brief due 04/24/2023 [23-6309] AW [Entered: 03/30/2023 11:34 AM]
March 30, 2023 Filing 2 FEE NOTICE issued to James Edward Rose, Jr. - initial notice. Fee or application to proceed as indigent due 05/01/2023 Originating case number: 4:23-cv-00130-HMH. Mailed to: Rose. [1001340845] [23-6309] AW [Entered: 03/30/2023 11:32 AM]
March 30, 2023 Filing 1 Habeas corpus appeal docketed. Originating case number: 4:23-cv-00130-HMH. Date notice of appeal filed: 03/27/2023. Case manager: AWalker. Did district court rule on COA? Yes. [1001340842] [23-6309] AW [Entered: 03/30/2023 11:29 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: James Rose, Jr. v. Randy Demory
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner / appellant: JAMES EDWARD ROSE, JR.
Represented By: James Edward Rose Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent / appellee: RANDY DEMORY, Director Hill-Finklea Detention Center
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: HONORABLE D. L. JEFFERSON
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: SHERIFF DUANE LEWIS
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?