Khammesherma Smith v. A. Nathaniel
| KHAMMESHERMA SMITH |
| A. NATHANIEL, Correctional Officer, OFFICER PUGH, Correctional Officer and OFFICER ALSTON, Correctional Officer |
| 23-6616 |
| June 22, 2023 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit |
| Prison Condition |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 1, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 Local Rule 45 mandate issued. Originating case number: 6:22-cv-03177-RMG. Mailed to: Khammesherma Smith. [1001412904] [23-6616] JSN [Entered: 08/01/2023 12:40 PM] |
Filing 6
ORDER filed dismissing appeal for failure to prosecute. Copies to all parties. Mailed to: Khammesherma Smith. [1001412901] [23-6616] JSN [Entered: 08/01/2023 12:39 PM]
|
| Filing 5 RULE 45 NOTICE issued to Khammesherma Smith re: failure to satisfy fee requirements under PLRA. Case will be dismissed if default is not cured within 15 days. Mailed to: Khammesherma Smith. [1001409582] [23-6616] JSN [Entered: 07/26/2023 12:54 PM] |
| Filing 4 RULE 45 NOTICE issued to Khammesherma Smith re: failure to satisfy fee requirements under PLRA. Mailed to: Khammesherma Smith. [1001398801] [23-6616] JSN [Entered: 07/10/2023 12:55 PM] |
| Filing 3 RECORD requested from Clerk of Court [1001389441]. Due: 07/06/2023. [23-6616] JSN [Entered: 06/22/2023 12:37 PM] |
| Filing 2 PLRA NOTICE issued to [ Khammesherma Smith ]. Fee due to District Court or PLRA application due to Court of Appeals within 15 days. Mailed to: Khammesherma Smith. [1001389438] [23-6616] JSN [Entered: 06/22/2023 12:36 PM] |
| Filing 1 Case docketed. Originating case number: 6:22-cv-03177-RMG. Case manager: JeffNeal. [1001389432] [23-6616] JSN [Entered: 06/22/2023 12:34 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.