David Meyers v. Laura Austin
| DAVID MEYERS |
| CLERK LAURA A. AUSTIN and U.S. DISTRICT COURT ROANOKE DIVISION FINANCIAL OFFICE |
| 23-6627 |
| June 27, 2023 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit |
| Prisoner Petitions-Mandamus/Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 10, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 RULE 45 NOTICE issued to David Meyers re: failure to satisfy fee requirements under PLRA. Case will be dismissed if default is not cured within 15 days. Mailed to: David Meyers. [1001418344] [23-6627] TB [Entered: 08/10/2023 12:16 PM] |
| Filing 6 COURT ORDER filed denying Motion for leave to proceed PLRA [4]. Copies to all parties. Mailed to: David Meyers. [1001418342] [23-6627] TB [Entered: 08/10/2023 12:15 PM] |
| Filing 4 PLRA-APPLICATION (court access only) by David Meyers. Consent to Payment Form: Yes; Trust Account Statement: Yes. [1001402957] [23-6627] TB [Entered: 07/17/2023 11:17 AM] |
| Filing 3 CHANGE OF ADDRESS Notice by David Meyers. [1001402955] [23-6627] TB [Entered: 07/17/2023 11:16 AM] |
| Filing 5 MOTION by David Meyers to extend filing time for PLRA application. Date and method of service: 07/07/2023 US mail. [1001402963] [23-6627] TB [Entered: 07/17/2023 11:20 AM] |
| Filing 2 PLRA NOTICE issued to David Meyers. Fee due to District Court or PLRA application due to Court of Appeals within 15 days. Mailed to: David Meyers. [1001392559] [23-6627] TB [Entered: 06/27/2023 03:41 PM] |
| Filing 1 Case docketed. Originating case number: 7:22-cv-00739-EKD-JCH. Case manager: TBarton. [1001392531] [23-6627] TB [Entered: 06/27/2023 03:35 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
