Alexander Cameron v. T. Ellis, III
ALEXANDER CAMERON |
T. S. ELLIS, III, District Court Judge, JAMES C. CLARK, Circuit Court Judge, BRYAN PORTER, Commonwealth Attorney, SUSAN FRIEMAN, Staff Attorney, JENNIFER L. GIVENS, Associated Professor, Legal Director, AMY M. CURTIS, Counsel for Department of Forensics, DEANNE DABBS, Forensic Scientist, JEFFREY D. BAN, Forensic Scientist, ANGIE M. RAINEY, Forensic Scientist and KAREN CURTIS AMBROZY, Forensic Scientist |
23-6645 |
June 29, 2023 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit |
Prisoner - Civil Rights |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 18, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 RULE 45 NOTICE issued to Alexander Cameron re: failure to satisfy fee requirements under PLRA. Case will be dismissed if default is not cured within 15 days. Mailed to: Alexander Cameron. [1001404105] [23-6645] MEB [Entered: 07/18/2023 01:19 PM] |
Filing 5 MOTION (titled as "Motion for Acknowledgment of the Record to be a Fraud") by Alexander Cameron. [1001403114] [23-6645] MEB [Entered: 07/17/2023 01:01 PM] |
Filing 4 Letter re: [ # 2 ] PLRA Notice by Alexander Cameron. [1001403109] [23-6645] MEB [Entered: 07/17/2023 01:00 PM] |
Filing 3 RECORD requested from Clerk of Court [1001393905]. Due: 07/13/2023. [23-6645] MEB [Entered: 06/29/2023 01:06 PM] |
Filing 2 PLRA NOTICE issued to [ Alexander Cameron ]. Fee due to District Court or PLRA application due to Court of Appeals within 15 days. Mailed to: Alexander Cameron. [1001393900] [23-6645] MEB [Entered: 06/29/2023 01:02 PM] |
Filing 1 Case docketed. Originating case number: 1:22-cv-01218-PTG-IDD. Case manager: MBeall. [1001393885] [23-6645] MEB [Entered: 06/29/2023 12:54 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.