Premiere Pouncey v. Christopher Bryant
| CHRISTOPHER ZANE BRYANT, ALAN LENNAU BERRY, JR. and LATTA POLICE DEPARTMENT |
| PREMIERE ANTOINE POUNCEY |
| 23-6922 |
| September 20, 2023 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit |
| Prisoner - Civil Rights |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
| Premiere Pouncey v. Christopher Bryant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 27, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Premiere Antoine Pouncey. Was any question on Disclosure Form answered yes? No [1001465070] [23-6922] RE [Entered: 10/31/2023 01:40 PM] |
| Filing 6 DOCKETING FORMS FOLLOW-UP NOTICE ISSUED to Premiere Antoine Pouncey re: filing of disclosure form. Mailed to: Premiere Pouncey. [1001456994] [23-6922] TW [Entered: 10/17/2023 02:10 PM] |
| Filing 5 INFORMAL OPENING BRIEF by Premiere Antoine Pouncey. [1001456992] [23-6922] TW [Entered: 10/17/2023 02:09 PM] |
| Filing 4 CHANGE OF ADDRESS Notice by Premiere Antoine Pouncey. [1001456851] [23-6922] TW [Entered: 10/17/2023 12:30 PM] |
| Filing 3 RECORD requested from Clerk of Court [1001442909]. Due: 10/04/2023. [23-6922] CP [Entered: 09/20/2023 03:24 PM] |
| Filing 2 INFORMAL BRIEFING ORDER filed. Mailed to: Premiere Antoine Pouncey. [1001442893] Informal Opening Brief due 10/16/2023 Informal response brief, if any: 14 days after informal opening brief served. [23-6922] CP [Entered: 09/20/2023 03:08 PM] |
| Filing 1 Case docketed. Originating case number: 4:23-cv-03215-RBH. Case manager: CPoulsen. [1001442880] [23-6922] CP [Entered: 09/20/2023 03:03 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
