Jason Critzer v. Manassas Foot Clinic
| JASON W. CRITZER |
| MANASSAS FOOT CLINIC, DR. RICARDO BENNETT and NURSE |
| 23-7235 |
| December 11, 2023 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit |
| Prisoner - Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 10, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 RULE 45 NOTICE issued to Jason W. Critzer for failure to satisfy PLRA and informal briefing requirements. Case will be dismissed if default is not cured within 15 days. Mailed to: Jason W. Critzer, #1160426, VADOC CENTRALIZED MAIL DISTRIBUTION CENTER, 3521 Woods Way, State Farm, VA 23160. [1001502741] [23-7235] KS [Entered: 01/10/2024 04:37 PM] |
| Filing 4 RECORD requested from Clerk of Court. Due: 12/27/2023. [1001486755] [23-7235] KS [Entered: 12/11/2023 10:17 AM] |
| Filing 3 INFORMAL BRIEFING ORDER filed. Mailed to: Jason W. Critzer, #1160426, VADOC CENTRALIZED MAIL DISTRIBUTION CENTER, 3521 Woods Way, State Farm, VA 23160. [1001486749] Informal Opening Brief due 01/04/2024. Informal response brief, if any: 14 days after informal opening brief served. [23-7235] KS [Entered: 12/11/2023 10:14 AM] |
| Filing 2 PLRA NOTICE issued to [ Jason W. Critzer ]. Fee due to District Court or PLRA application due to Court of Appeals within 15 days. Mailed to: Jason W. Critzer, #1160426, VADOC CENTRALIZED MAIL DISTRIBUTION CENTER, 3521 Woods Way, State Farm, VA 23160. [1001486744] [23-7235] KS [Entered: 12/11/2023 10:10 AM] |
| Filing 1 Case docketed. Originating case number: 3:22-cv-00553-JAG-MRC. Case manager: KStump. [1001486739] [23-7235] KS [Entered: 12/11/2023 10:07 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
