Jonathan Pendleton v. Louise DiMatteo
| JONATHAN PENDLETON |
| LOUISE MARIE DIMATTEO, Arlington Circuit Court Judge, PAUL FERGUSON, Arlington Circuit Court Clerk and NELSON SMITH, Commissioner, Virginia Department of Behavioral Health and Developmental Services |
| 23-7293 |
| December 21, 2023 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit |
| Habeas Corpus |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 8, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 15 COURT ORDER filed denying Motion to seal [ # 7 ]; denying Motion for other relief - to proceed under pseudonym [ # 7 ]; denying Motion for attorney's fees [ # 7 ]; denying Motion for stay pending appeal [ # 7 ]. Copies to all parties. Mailed to: Jonathan Pendleton. [1001518609] [23-7293] RP [Entered: 02/08/2024 03:25 PM] |
| Filing 14 INFORMAL OPENING BRIEF by Jonathan Pendleton. [1001504214] [23-7293] Jonathan Pendleton [Entered: 01/14/2024 05:43 PM] |
Filing 13
ORDER filed deferring action on Motion for certificate of appealability filed by Appellant Jonathan Pendleton [ # 5 ]. Copies to all parties. [1001500990] [23-7293] RP [Entered: 01/08/2024 01:24 PM]
|
| Filing 12 RESPONSE/ANSWER by Nelson Smith to [ # 7 ], for other relief [ # 7 ], for attorney's fees [ # 7 ], for stay pending appeal [ # 7 ]. Nature of response: in opposition. [1001500951] [23-7293] Kevin Gallagher [Entered: 01/08/2024 12:55 PM] |
| Filing 11 APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL by Kevin M. Gallagher for Nelson Smith. [1001500946] [23-7293] Kevin Gallagher [Entered: 01/08/2024 12:51 PM] |
|
Filing 10
ORDER filed granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis [6]. Copies to all parties. [1001496549] [23-7293] RP [Entered: 12/29/2023 10:21 AM]
|
| Filing 9 NOTICE ISSUED to Nelson Smith requesting response to Motion for stay pending appeal, to seal, to proceed under pseudonym, for attorney's fees [ # 7 ]. Response due 01/08/2024 [1001496548]. [23-7293]--[Edited 12/29/2023 by AB to modify docket text] RP [Entered: 12/29/2023 10:19 AM] |
| Filing 8 RECORD FOLLOW UP NOTICE ISSUED to Clerk of Court. [1001496452] Due: 01/12/2024. [23-7293] RP [Entered: 12/29/2023 09:14 AM] |
| Filing 7 MOTION by Jonathan Pendleton for stay pending appeal, to seal, to proceed under pseudonym, for attorney's fees. Date and method of service: 12/28/2023 ecf. [1001496369] [23-7293]. [1001496369]--[Edited 12/29/2023 by AB to modify docket text]. [1001496369] Jonathan Pendleton [Entered: 12/28/2023 09:15 PM] |
| Filing 6 IFP-APPLICATION to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24)(court access only) by Jonathan Pendleton. [1001496368] [23-7293] Jonathan Pendleton [Entered: 12/28/2023 09:14 PM] |
| Filing 5 Emergency MOTION by Jonathan Pendleton for a certificate of appealability. Date and method of service: 12/28/2023 ecf. [1001496367] [23-7293]. [1001496367]--[Edited 12/29/2023 by AB to modify docket text] Jonathan Pendleton [Entered: 12/28/2023 09:13 PM] |
| Filing 4 RECORD requested from Clerk of Court [1001493747]. Due: 01/04/2024. [23-7293] RP [Entered: 12/21/2023 11:37 AM] |
| Filing 3 INFORMAL PRELIMINARY BRIEFING ORDER filed. [1001493742] Informal Opening Brief due 01/16/2024 [23-7293] RP [Entered: 12/21/2023 11:36 AM] |
| Filing 2 FEE NOTICE issued to Jonathan Pendleton - initial notice. Fee or application to proceed as indigent due 01/22/2024. Originating case number: 3:23-cv-00734-RCY-MRC.. [1001493741] [23-7293] RP [Entered: 12/21/2023 11:35 AM] |
| Filing 1 Habeas corpus appeal docketed. Originating case number: 3:23-cv-00734-RCY-MRC. Date notice of appeal filed: 12/12/2023. Case manager: RachelPhillips. Did district court rule on COA? Yes. [1001493731] [23-7293] RP [Entered: 12/21/2023 11:31 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
