Jewell Smokeless Coal Corporation v. DOWCP
JEWELL SMOKELESS COAL CORPORATION |
DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION PROGRAMS, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR and ROGER L. HALE, SR. |
24-1081 |
January 24, 2024 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 24, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 NOTICE ISSUED serving respondent and requesting record. Date petition for review or application filed: January 24, 2024. [ # 3 ] petition for review. [1001509202] Administrative Record due 03/04/2024. [24-1081] MEB [Entered: 01/24/2024 01:54 PM] |
Filing 6 DOCKETING NOTICE issued Re: [ # 3 ] petition for review. Originating case number: 22-0521 BLA. [1001509198] [24-1081] MEB [Entered: 01/24/2024 01:51 PM] |
Filing 5 APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL by Jeffrey S. Goldberg for DOWCP. [1001509194] [24-1081] Jeffrey Goldberg [Entered: 01/24/2024 01:50 PM] |
Filing 4 NOTICE ISSUED to Roger L. Hale, Sr. re: status of counsel. Mailed to: Roger Hale; Bradley Johnson, Stone Mountain Health Services, P.O. Box 369, Vansant, VA 24656. [1001509185] Status of Counsel due 02/05/2024. [24-1081] MEB [Entered: 01/24/2024 01:43 PM] |
Filing 3 Petition for review of agency order filed by Jewell Smokeless Coal Corporation .[1001509182] [24-1081] MEB [Entered: 01/24/2024 01:40 PM] |
Filing 2 Electronic filing fee paid. Filing Fee: $600.00. Receipt Number: A04-74912-381. [1001509179] [24-1081] MEB [Entered: 01/24/2024 01:37 PM] |
Filing 1 Case docketed. Originating case number: 22-0521 BLA. Case manager: MBeall. [1001509175] [24-1081] MEB [Entered: 01/24/2024 01:33 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.