Sulma De Jesus Guandique-De Romero v. Merrick Garland
Petitioner: SULMA DE JESUS GUANDIQUE-DE ROMERO, W.A.R.G. and Z.M.R.G.
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General
Case Number: 24-1154
Filed: February 20, 2024
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 20, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 20, 2024 Filing 7 Attorney John Hogan for Merrick B. Garland in 24-1154 terminated from case. Reason for termination: Not participating. [1001524036] [24-1154] KH [Entered: 02/20/2024 04:20 PM]
February 20, 2024 Filing 6 APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL by Sarah E. Witri for Merrick B. Garland. [1001523874] [24-1154] Sarah Witri [Entered: 02/20/2024 02:56 PM]
February 20, 2024 Filing 5 NOTICE ISSUED re: case caption. [1001523472] [24-1154] KH [Entered: 02/20/2024 11:04 AM]
February 20, 2024 Filing 4 NOTICE ISSUED serving respondent and requesting record. Date petition for review filed: February 16, 2024. [ # 2 ] petition for review. [1001523466] Administrative Record due 04/01/2024. Mailed to: Office of General Counsel U.S. Department of Homeland Security 245 Murray Lane SW Mail Stop 0485 Washington, DC 20528-0485. [24-1154] KH [Entered: 02/20/2024 10:58 AM]
February 20, 2024 Filing 3 DOCKETING NOTICE issued Re: [ # 2 ] petition for review. Originating case number: A209-979-254, A209-979-255, A209-979-256. [1001523463] [24-1154] KH [Entered: 02/20/2024 10:56 AM]
February 20, 2024 Immigration Petition for Review case docketed. Originating case number: A209-979-254, A209-979-255, A209-979-256. Case manager: KHancock. [1001523456] [24-1154] KH [Entered: 02/20/2024 10:52 AM]
February 16, 2024 Filing 2 Petition for review of agency order filed by Sulma De Jesus Guandique-De Romero, W.A.R.G. and Z.M.R.G. [1001523461] [24-1154] KH [Entered: 02/20/2024 10:55 AM]
February 16, 2024 Filing 1 Electronic filing fee paid. Filing Fee: $600.00. Receipt Number: A04-74994-31. [1001523460] [24-1154] KH [Entered: 02/20/2024 10:53 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Sulma De Jesus Guandique-De Romero v. Merrick Garland
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: SULMA DE JESUS GUANDIQUE-DE ROMERO
Represented By: Paul Whitfield Hughes III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: W.A.R.G.
Represented By: Paul Whitfield Hughes III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Z.M.R.G.
Represented By: Paul Whitfield Hughes III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General
Represented By: OIL
Represented By: Sarah E. Witri
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?