Diana Mey v. William Pintas
| DIANA MEY, on behalf of herself and a class of others similarly situated |
| WILLIAM PINTAS, P&M LAW FIRM, LLC, P&M LAW FIRM (PR), LLC, RELIANCE LITIGATION LLC and JAMES RYDER INTERACTIVE LLC |
| 24-1494 |
| May 31, 2024 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit |
| Telephone Consumer Protection Act |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 3, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL by Andrew C. Robey for Diana Mey. [1001578101] [24-1494] Andrew Robey [Entered: 06/03/2024 09:37 AM] |
| Filing 5 APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL by Ryan M. Donovan for Diana Mey. [1001578098] [24-1494] Ryan Donovan [Entered: 06/03/2024 09:35 AM] |
| Filing 4 APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL by Richard W. Epstein for P&M Law Firm (PR), LLC, William Pintas and P&M Law Firm, LLC. [1001578031] [24-1494] Richard Epstein [Entered: 06/03/2024 09:00 AM] |
| Filing 3 BRIEFING ORDER filed. Mailed to: Carlos R. Baralt Suarez and Jeffrey Gilbert. No paper copies required unless case has been tentatively calendared or copies otherwise ordered. All filings must comply with # Appendix Pagination & Brief Citation Guide . [1001577342] Opening Brief and Appendix due 07/10/2024. Response Brief due 08/09/2024. [24-1494] RP [Entered: 05/31/2024 10:40 AM] |
| Filing 2 DOCKETING NOTICE issued Re: [ # 1 ] case. Originating case number: 5:24-cv-00055-JPB. Mailed to: Carlos R. Baralt Suarez and Jeffrey Gilbert. [1001577338] [24-1494] RP [Entered: 05/31/2024 10:36 AM] |
| Filing 1 Case docketed. Originating case number: 5:24-cv-00055-JPB. Case manager: RachelPhillips. [1001577328] [24-1494] RP [Entered: 05/31/2024 10:31 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
