Yasmani Rubio v. City of Alexandria, Virginia
| YASMANI GURRI RUBIO |
| JUSTIN MICHAEL WILSON, Mayor in his individual capacity, THE CITY OF ALEXANDRIA, VIRGINIA, ADP MICHAEL ROCHE, in his individual capacity, ADP ROBERT POND, in his individual capacity, CHIEF OF ALEXANDRIA POLICE, in his individual capacity, ADP CODY SAVAGE, in his individual capacity and ADP JAMIE BRIDGEMAN, in his individual capacity |
| 24-1621 |
| July 9, 2024 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit |
| Other Civil Rights |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
| Yasmani Rubio v. City of Alexandria, Virginia |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 26, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 MOTION by Yasmani Gurri Rubio for leave to file informal supplemental brief [ # 5 ]. Date and method of service: 08/26/2024 US mail. [1001625593] [24-1621] RP [Entered: 08/26/2024 04:00 PM] |
| Filing 5 SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMAL OPENING BRIEF by Yasmani Gurri Rubio. [1001625592] [24-1621] RP [Entered: 08/26/2024 03:59 PM] |
| Filing 4 INFORMAL OPENING BRIEF by Yasmani Gurri Rubio. [1001611186] [24-1621] RP [Entered: 07/31/2024 02:41 PM] |
| Filing 3 RECORD requested from Clerk of Court [1001597853]. Due: 07/23/2024. [24-1621] RP [Entered: 07/09/2024 03:12 PM] |
| Filing 2 INFORMAL BRIEFING ORDER filed. Mailed to: Yasmani Gurri Rubio. [1001597852] Informal Opening Brief due 08/02/2024. Informal response brief, if any: 14 days after informal opening brief served. [24-1621] RP [Entered: 07/09/2024 03:11 PM] |
| Filing 1 Case docketed. Originating case number: 3:24-cv-00193-DJN. Case manager: RachelPhillips. [1001597848] [24-1621] RP [Entered: 07/09/2024 03:07 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
