William Allen v. Blackbaud, Inc.
| WILLIAM ALLEN, KATHLEEN ARMAN, WILLIAM CARPANELLA, JESSICA CASE, KASSANDRE CLAYTON, CHRISTINA DURANKO, PHILIP EISEN, MAMIE ESTES, LATRICIA FORD, JOSEPH I. FRONTERA, CATHARINE GIGNAC, WILLIAM GLASPER, DOROTHY KAMM, HELEN LOFTON, ERIC MANDEL, COTY MARTIN, ALEXANDRA MITCHELL, RALPH PERAGINE, MICHELLE PETTIFORD, RACHEL ROTH, CLIFFORD SCOTT, ABBI SHETH, DONNA STEINHORN and KAREN ZIELINSKI |
| BLACKBAUD, INC., Customer Data Security Breach Litigation MDL 2972 |
| 24-180 |
| May 29, 2024 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 30, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 RULE 5 NOTICE issued to Blackbaud, Inc. requesting response to petition. Mailed to: Gretchen Cappio, Krysta Pachman, Harper Segui, Ashley Taylor Jr., Amy P. Williams. [1001576625] [24-180] RP [Entered: 05/30/2024 10:05 AM] |
| Filing 1 Permission to appeal case docketed. Originating case number: 3:20-mn-02972-JFA. Case manager: RachelPhillips. [1001576089] [24-180]--[Edited 05/30/2024 by RP - form edited to reflect the correct petitioners] RP [Entered: 05/29/2024 02:43 PM] |
| Filing 2 Petition for permission to appeal filed by William Allen, Kathleen Arman, William Carpanella, Jessica Case, Kassandre Clayton, Christina Duranko, Philip Eisen, Mamie Estes, Latricia Ford, Joseph I. Frontera, Catharine Gignac, William Glasper, Dorothy Kamm, Helen Lofton, Eric Mandel, Coty Martin, Alexandra Mitchell, Ralph Peragine, Michelle Pettiford, Rachel Roth, Clifford Scott, Abbi Sheth, Donna Steinhorn and Karen Zielinski.. [1001576614] [24-180] RP [Entered: 05/30/2024 10:02 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
