In re: Gregory Richardson
| In re: GREGORY A. RICHARDSON |
| 24-182 |
| June 3, 2024 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 5, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 MOTION by Gregory A. Richardson to appoint/assign counsel. Date and method of service: 06/01/2024 US mail. [1001580063] [24-182] JSN [Entered: 06/05/2024 12:10 PM] |
| Filing 3 DOCKETING NOTICE issued Re: [ # 2 ] Motion for authorization to file successive habeas application (Local Rule 22(d)). Mailed to: Gregory Richardson. [1001578443] [24-182] JSN [Entered: 06/03/2024 01:43 PM] |
| Filing 1 2244 case docketed. Case manager: JeffNeal. [1001578435] [24-182] JSN [Entered: 06/03/2024 01:39 PM] |
| Filing 2 Motion for authorization to file successive application for post-conviction relief (Local Rule 22(d)) filed by Gregory A. Richardson. Are PSR & SOR available on district court docket? NA. Has sentencing transcript been prepared? NA. [1001578441] [24-182] JSN [Entered: 06/03/2024 01:42 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: In re: Gregory Richardson | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: In re: GREGORY A. RICHARDSON | |
| Represented By: | Gregory A. Richardson |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
