James Blackmon v. James Holder
| JAMES BLACKMON, a/k/a Jimmy Andrew Underwood, by and through his Guardian of the Estate, Paul Truett Canady, II |
| ANDREW MUNDAY, in his individual capacity, CITY OF RALEIGH and JAMES HOLDER, in his individual capacity |
| 24-2014 |
| October 11, 2024 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit |
| Other Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 20, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 19 JOINT APPENDIX by James Blackmon and City of Raleigh, James Holder and Andrew Munday. Digital media exhibit volume? No. [1001674953] [24-2014] David Rudolf [Entered: 11/20/2024 02:01 PM] |
| Filing 18 BRIEF by James Blackmon. Type of Brief: OPENING. . Do any cases pending in this court or the Supreme Court of the United States raise similar issues? NO.. [1001674949] [24-2014] David Rudolf [Entered: 11/20/2024 02:00 PM] |
| Filing 17 APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL by Sonya Pfeiffer for James Blackmon. [1001661372] [24-2014] Sonya Pfeiffer [Entered: 10/25/2024 10:50 AM] |
| Filing 16 APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL by Rachel E. Keen for Andrew Munday. [1001661137] [24-2014] Rachel Keen [Entered: 10/25/2024 08:07 AM] |
| Filing 15 APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL by Caitlin T. Augerson for Andrew Munday. [1001661135] [24-2014] Caitlin Augerson [Entered: 10/25/2024 08:02 AM] |
| Filing 14 APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL by Caroline B. Barrineau for James Holder. [1001661097] [24-2014] Caroline Barrineau [Entered: 10/24/2024 05:57 PM] |
| Filing 13 APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL by Daniel E. Peterson for James Holder. [1001661096] [24-2014] Daniel Peterson [Entered: 10/24/2024 05:54 PM] |
| Filing 12 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by James Holder. Was any question on Disclosure Form answered yes? No [1001661095] [24-2014] Jason Benton [Entered: 10/24/2024 05:52 PM] |
| Filing 11 APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL by Jason R. Benton for James Holder. [1001661094] [24-2014] Jason Benton [Entered: 10/24/2024 05:51 PM] |
| Filing 10 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Andrew Munday. Was any question on Disclosure Form answered yes? No [1001661086] [24-2014] Sonny Haynes [Entered: 10/24/2024 05:21 PM] |
| Filing 9 APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL by Sonny S. Haynes for Andrew Munday. [1001661085] [24-2014] Sonny Haynes [Entered: 10/24/2024 05:19 PM] |
| Filing 8 Attorney Sonya Pfeiffer for James Blackmon in 24-2014 terminated from case. Reason for termination: Not participating. [1001660879] [24-2014] JSN [Entered: 10/24/2024 03:25 PM] |
| Filing 7 APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL by Joseph P. Lattimore for James Blackmon. [1001660765] [24-2014] Joseph Lattimore [Entered: 10/24/2024 02:17 PM] |
| Filing 6 DOCKETING STATEMENT by James Blackmon.. [1001660764] [24-2014] David Rudolf [Entered: 10/24/2024 02:16 PM] |
| Filing 5 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by James Blackmon. Was any question on Disclosure Form answered yes? No [1001660763] [24-2014] David Rudolf [Entered: 10/24/2024 02:14 PM] |
| Filing 4 APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL by David S. Rudolf for James Blackmon. [1001660760] [24-2014] David Rudolf [Entered: 10/24/2024 02:13 PM] |
| Filing 3 BRIEFING ORDER filed. No paper copies required unless case has been tentatively calendared or copies otherwise ordered. All filings must comply with # Appendix Pagination & Brief Citation Guide . [1001653366] Opening Brief and Appendix due 11/20/2024. Response Brief due 12/20/2024. [24-2014] JSN [Entered: 10/11/2024 01:18 PM] |
| Filing 2 DOCKETING NOTICE issued Re: [ # 1 ] case. Originating case number: 5:23-cv-00578-FL. [1001653365] [24-2014] JSN [Entered: 10/11/2024 01:16 PM] |
| Filing 1 Case docketed. Originating case number: 5:23-cv-00578-FL. Case manager: JeffNeal. [1001653362] [24-2014] JSN [Entered: 10/11/2024 01:12 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
