Adam Hall v. Sergeant Truner
| ADAM WADE HALL |
| SERGEANT TRUNER and DAC OF PRISON |
| 24-6148 |
| February 20, 2024 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit |
| Prison Condition |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 11, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 Local Rule 45 mandate issued. Originating case number: 5:23-ct-03338-D. Mailed to: Adam Wade Hall. [1001551266] [24-6148] EB [Entered: 04/11/2024 01:23 PM] |
Filing 6
ORDER filed dismissing appeal for failure to prosecute. Copies to all parties. Mailed to: Adam Wade Hall. [1001551264] [24-6148] EB [Entered: 04/11/2024 01:22 PM]
|
| Filing 5 RULE 45 NOTICE issued to Adam Wade Hall re: failure to satisfy fee requirements under PLRA. Case will be dismissed if default is not cured within 15 days. Mailed to: Adam Wade Hall. [1001533309] [24-6148] EB [Entered: 03/07/2024 04:04 PM] |
|
Filing 4
ORDER filed denying motion for leave to proceed PLRA [3]. Copies to all parties. Mailed to: Adam Wade Hall. [1001533300] [24-6148] EB [Entered: 03/07/2024 04:01 PM]
|
| Filing 3 PLRA-APPLICATION (court access only) by Adam Wade Hall. Consent to Payment Form: Yes; Trust Account Statement: Yes. [1001533278] [24-6148] EB [Entered: 03/07/2024 03:41 PM] |
| Filing 2 PLRA NOTICE issued to [ Adam Wade Hall ]. Fee due to District Court or PLRA application due to Court of Appeals within 15 days. Mailed to: Adam Wade Hall. [1001523802] [24-6148] EB [Entered: 02/20/2024 02:04 PM] |
| Filing 1 Case docketed. Originating case number: 5:23-ct-03338-D. Case manager: EBorneisen. [1001523746] [24-6148] EB [Entered: 02/20/2024 01:30 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
