Londell Alston v. John Hicks
LONDELL LASHUN ALSTON |
JOHN HICKS, Chief, RODNEY HOPE, Sergeant, Chief and COUNTY OF YORK |
24-6190 |
March 4, 2024 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit |
Prisoner - Civil Rights |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 2, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 RULE 45 NOTICE issued to Londell Lashun Alston re: for failure to satisfy PLRA and informal briefing requirements. Case will be dismissed if default is not cured within 15 days. Mailed to: Alston. [1001546710] [24-6190] AW [Entered: 04/02/2024 04:50 PM] |
Filing 6 ORDER filed deferring action on Motion to appoint/assign counsel filed by Appellant Londell Lashun Alston [ # 5 ] Copies to all parties. Mailed to: Alston. [1001539277] [24-6190] AW [Entered: 03/20/2024 10:03 AM] |
Filing 5 MOTION by Londell Lashun Alston to appoint/assign counsel. MOTION TRANSFERRED FROM DISTRICT COURT? Y. [1001539275] [24-6190] AW [Entered: 03/20/2024 10:02 AM] |
Filing 4 RECORD requested from Clerk of Court [1001530813]. Due: 03/18/2024. [24-6190] AW [Entered: 03/04/2024 11:18 AM] |
Filing 3 INFORMAL BRIEFING ORDER filed. Mailed to: Alston. [1001530812] Informal Opening Brief due 03/28/2024 Informal response brief, if any: 14 days after informal opening brief served. [24-6190] AW [Entered: 03/04/2024 11:16 AM] |
Filing 2 PLRA NOTICE issued to [ Londell Lashun Alston ]. Fee due to District Court or PLRA application due to Court of Appeals within 15 days. Mailed to: Alston. [1001530810] [24-6190] AW [Entered: 03/04/2024 11:14 AM] |
Filing 1 Case docketed. Originating case number: 0:24-cv-00314-MGL. Case manager: AWalker. [1001530808] [24-6190] AW [Entered: 03/04/2024 11:13 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.