Kenneth Rivera v. Dennis Patterson
| KENNETH RIVERA, a/k/a Kenneth D. Rivera, a/k/a Kenneth Rivera, a/k/a Syncere Shabazz |
| DENNIS PATTERSON, D.H.O., STACEY RICHARDSON, Inmate Classification, MR. FREDDRIKS, Associate Warden, MS. JACKSON, I.C.C., MS. BRYAN, I.C.C., MS. GREEN, I.C.C. and JESSICA SALLEY, RHU Coordinator |
| 24-6208 |
| March 6, 2024 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit |
| Prisoner - Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 15, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 PLRA/IFP-TRUST ACCOUNT STATEMENT (court access only) by Kenneth Rivera. [1001555791] [24-6208] KH [Entered: 04/19/2024 03:33 PM] |
| Filing 5 RULE 45 NOTICE issued to Kenneth Rivera re: failure to satisfy fee requirements under PLRA. Case will be dismissed if default is not cured within 15 days. [1001548065] [24-6208] DL [Entered: 04/04/2024 04:36 PM] |
Filing 4
ORDER filed denying Motion for leave to proceed PLRA [3] Copies to all parties. Mailed to: Kenneth Rivera. [1001548059] [24-6208] DL [Entered: 04/04/2024 04:32 PM]
|
| Filing 3 PLRA-APPLICATION (court access only) by Kenneth Rivera. Consent to Payment Form: Yes; Trust Account Statement: No. [1001547510] [24-6208] KH [Entered: 04/04/2024 09:17 AM] |
| Filing 2 PLRA NOTICE issued to [ Kenneth Rivera ]. Fee due to District Court or PLRA application due to Court of Appeals within 15 days. Mailed to: Kenneth Rivera. [1001532735] [24-6208] KH [Entered: 03/06/2024 05:02 PM] |
| Filing 1 Case docketed. Originating case number: 8:23-cv-01107-SAL. Case manager: KHancock. [1001532731] [24-6208] KH [Entered: 03/06/2024 05:00 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
