Michael Fuller v. Chadwick Dotson
MICHAEL ROY FULLER |
CHADWICK DOTSON, Director |
24-6254 |
March 20, 2024 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit |
Habeas Corpus |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 20, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 3 INFORMAL PRELIMINARY BRIEFING ORDER filed. [1001539411] Informal Opening Brief due 04/15/2024 [24-6254] TF [Entered: 03/20/2024 11:35 AM] |
Filing 2 RECORD requested from Clerk of Court [1001539408]. Due: 04/03/2024. [24-6254] TF [Entered: 03/20/2024 11:34 AM] |
Filing 1 Habeas corpus appeal docketed. Originating case number: 3:23-cv-00256-MHL. Date notice of appeal filed: 03/16/2024. Case manager: TFischer. Did district court rule on COA? Yes (dn). [1001539288] [24-6254] TF [Entered: 03/20/2024 10:09 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: Michael Fuller v. Chadwick Dotson | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: MICHAEL ROY FULLER | |
Represented By: | David Bernard Hargett |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: CHADWICK DOTSON, Director | |
Represented By: | Liam Alexander Curry |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.