US v. Duane Berry
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
DUANE LETROY BERRY |
24-6457 |
May 10, 2024 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit |
Prisoner Petitions-Mandamus/Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 13, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 3 APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL by Genna D. Petre for US. [1001567267] [24-6457] Genna Petre [Entered: 05/13/2024 10:40 AM] |
Filing 2 INFORMAL BRIEFING ORDER filed. [1001566733] Informal Opening Brief due 06/03/2024 Informal response brief, if any: 14 days after informal opening brief served. [24-6457] RHS [Entered: 05/10/2024 12:59 PM] |
Filing 1 Case docketed. Originating case number: 5:20-hc-02085-M. Case manager: RSewell. [1001566704] [24-6457] RHS [Entered: 05/10/2024 12:38 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: US v. Duane Berry | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA | |
Represented By: | Genna Danelle Petre |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: DUANE LETROY BERRY | |
Represented By: | Duane Letroy Berry |
Represented By: | Jaclyn L. Tarlton |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.