Jorge Galeas Menchu-El, Jr. v. Harnett Correctional Institution
| JORGE GALEAS MENCHU-EL, JR., a/k/a Jorge Gevara, a/k/a Jorge Galeas, Jr. |
| NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF SRG, CONGRESS OF UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF INSTITUTIONS, HARNETT CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION, HARNETT COUNTY, STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ADULT CORRECTIONS, SOMMERS and NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY |
| 24-7148 |
| December 5, 2024 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit |
| Prison Condition |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 28, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 Local Rule 45 mandate issued. Originating case number: 5:24-ct-03189-M. Mailed to: Jorge Galeas Menchu-El. [1001710080] [24-7148] AW [Entered: 01/28/2025 12:36 PM] |
Filing 4
ORDER filed dismissing appeal for failure to prosecute. Copies to all parties. Mailed to: Jorge Galeas Menchu-El. [1001710078] [24-7148] AW [Entered: 01/28/2025 12:35 PM]
|
| Filing 3 RULE 45 NOTICE issued to Jorge Galeas Menchu-El, Jr. re: failure to satisfy fee requirements under PLRA Case may be dismissed if default is not cured within 15 days. Mailed to: Galeas Menchu-El. [1001693147] [24-7148] AW [Entered: 12/29/2024 06:31 PM] |
| Filing 2 PLRA NOTICE issued to [ Jorge Galeas Menchu-El, Jr. ]. Fee due to District Court or PLRA application due to Court of Appeals within 15 days. Mailed to: Galeas Menchu-El. [1001681708] [24-7148] AW [Entered: 12/05/2024 10:45 AM] |
| Filing 1 Case docketed. Originating case number: 5:24-ct-03189-M. Case manager: AWalker. [1001681699] [24-7148] AW [Entered: 12/05/2024 10:40 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.