Orayl Ingram v. Commonwealth of Virginia
| ORAYL INGRAM |
| ELIZABETH CARTER, Case Manager with Fairfax County Child Protective Services, COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES, FAIRFAX COUNTY CHILD PROTECTIVE SERVICES, COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA, FAIRFAX COUNTY POLICE DEPARTMENT, FAIRFAX COUNTY COMMONWEALTH ATTORNEY'S OFFICE, STEPHEN THOMAS DESCANO, JR., Commonwealth Attorney with Commonwealth Attorney's Office, COUNTY OF FAIRFAX, VIRGINIA, JONATHAN ORTIZ, PCA II with Fairfax County Police Department, CITY OF FAIRFAX, VIRGINIA, ANGIE COMBS, Sergeant with Fairfax County Sheriff's Department and RICHARD MULLINS, Detective with Fairfax County Police Department |
| 24-7182 |
| December 13, 2024 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit |
| Other Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 13, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 RECORD requested from Clerk of Court [1001686895]. Due: 12/27/2024. [24-7182] AW [Entered: 12/13/2024 04:37 PM] |
| Filing 3 INFORMAL BRIEFING ORDER filed. Mailed to: Ingram. [1001686890] Informal Opening Brief due 01/06/2025 Informal response brief, if any: 14 days after informal opening brief served. [24-7182] AW [Entered: 12/13/2024 04:35 PM] |
| Filing 2 PLRA NOTICE issued to [ Orayl Ingram ]. Fee due to District Court or PLRA application due to Court of Appeals within 15 days. Mailed to: Ingram. [1001686888] [24-7182] AW [Entered: 12/13/2024 04:34 PM] |
| Filing 1 Case docketed. Originating case number: 1:22-cv-00778-MSN-IDD. Case manager: AWalker. [1001686884] [24-7182] AW [Entered: 12/13/2024 04:32 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
