Eshawn Scipio v. Finklea, Hendrick & Blake, LLC
Plaintiff: ESHAWN JESSICA SCIPIO
Defendant: FINKLEA, HENDRICK & BLAKE, LLC, GARY I. FINKLEA, In his individual and official capacity, CHARLIE JAMES BLAKE, JR., In his individual and official capacity, CHARLIE SCIPIO, In his individual capacity under binding contractual agreement, ELVIRA CALDWELL, In her individual capacity under binding contractual agreement and BERNICE WHEELER, In her individual capacity under binding contractual agreement
Case Number: 25-1757
Filed: July 7, 2025
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
September 22, 2025 Eshawn Scipio v. Finklea, Hendrick & Blake, LLC

Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 29, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 29, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 12 Mandate issued. Referencing: [ # 6 ] unpublished per curiam Opinion , [ # 7 ] Judgment Order. Originating case number: 4:23-cv-06088-JD. [1001868538] [25-1757] SB [Entered: 10/29/2025 08:24 AM]
October 21, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 11 COURT ORDER filed denying Motion for rehearing and rehearing en banc [ # 8 ]. Copies to all parties. [1001863742] [25-1757] SB [Entered: 10/21/2025 09:40 AM]
October 6, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 10 Mandate temporarily stayed pending ruling on petition for rehearing or rehearing en banc. [1001854604] [25-1757] SB [Entered: 10/06/2025 09:38 AM]
October 3, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 9 Exhibit(s) [ # 8 ] Motion by Ms. Eshawn Jessica Scipio.. [1001854415] [25-1757] Eshawn Scipio [Entered: 10/03/2025 04:42 PM]
October 3, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 8 PETITION for rehearing and rehearing en banc by Ms. Eshawn Jessica Scipio. [1001854409] [25-1757] Eshawn Scipio [Entered: 10/03/2025 04:41 PM]
September 22, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 7 JUDGMENT ORDER filed. Decision: Affirmed. Originating case number: 4:23-cv-06088-JD. Entered on Docket Date: 09/22/2025. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [1001846022] [25-1757] SB [Entered: 09/22/2025 09:26 AM]
September 22, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 6 UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 4:23-cv-06088-JD. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [1001846014] [25-1757] SB [Entered: 09/22/2025 09:20 AM]
July 31, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 5 INFORMAL OPENING BRIEF by Ms. Eshawn Jessica Scipio. [1001815080] [25-1757] Eshawn Scipio [Entered: 07/31/2025 11:45 AM]
July 22, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 4 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Ms. Eshawn Jessica Scipio. Was any question on Disclosure Form answered yes? No [1001808305] [25-1757] Eshawn Scipio [Entered: 07/22/2025 09:09 AM]
July 7, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 3 RECORD requested from Clerk of Court [1001799136]. Due: 07/21/2025. [25-1757] SB [Entered: 07/07/2025 11:49 AM]
July 7, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 2 INFORMAL BRIEFING ORDER filed. [1001799134] Informal Opening Brief due 07/31/2025 Informal response brief, if any: 14 days after informal opening brief served. [25-1757] SB [Entered: 07/07/2025 11:48 AM]
July 7, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 1 Case docketed. Originating case number: 4:23-cv-06088-JD. Case manager: SBatchleor. [1001799130] [25-1757] SB [Entered: 07/07/2025 11:45 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Eshawn Scipio v. Finklea, Hendrick & Blake, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: ESHAWN JESSICA SCIPIO
Represented By: Eshawn Jessica Scipio
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: FINKLEA, HENDRICK & BLAKE, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: GARY I. FINKLEA, In his individual and official capacity
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: CHARLIE JAMES BLAKE, JR., In his individual and official capacity
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: CHARLIE SCIPIO, In his individual capacity under binding contractual agreement
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: ELVIRA CALDWELL, In her individual capacity under binding contractual agreement
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: BERNICE WHEELER, In her individual capacity under binding contractual agreement
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?