Vahn Williams v. Scott Massengill
| VAHN OMAR WILLIAMS |
| SCOTT MASSENGILL, Administrative Law Judge, MR. SIMMONS, Case Worker, MR. IMADOJEMUN, Supervisor and SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION |
| 25-2051 |
| September 8, 2025 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit |
| S.S.I.D. |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 14, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 Local Rule 45 mandate issued. Originating case number: 1:24-cv-03122-DRM. Mailed to: Vahn Omar Williams. [1001877897] [25-2051] SB [Entered: 11/14/2025 01:47 PM] |
Filing 6
ORDER filed dismissing appeal for failure to prosecute. Copies to all parties. Mailed to: Vahn Omar Williams. [1001877896] [25-2051] SB [Entered: 11/14/2025 01:45 PM]
|
| Filing 5 RULE 45 NOTICE issued to Vahn Omar Williams re: failure to file informal brief. Mailed to: Vahn Williams. [1001854834] [25-2051] SB [Entered: 10/06/2025 12:09 PM] |
| Filing 4 APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL by Thomas Zimarowski for SSA. [1001840610] [25-2051] Thomas Zimarowski [Entered: 09/12/2025 11:04 AM] |
| Filing 3 RECORD requested from Clerk of Court [1001836817]. Due: 09/22/2025. [25-2051] SB [Entered: 09/08/2025 12:13 PM] |
| Filing 2 INFORMAL BRIEFING ORDER filed. Mailed to: Vahn Omar Williams. [1001836810] Informal Opening Brief due 10/02/2025 Informal response brief, if any: 14 days after informal opening brief served. [25-2051] SB [Entered: 09/08/2025 12:11 PM] |
| Filing 1 Case docketed. Originating case number: 1:24-cv-03122-DRM. Case manager: SBatchleor. [1001836780] [25-2051] SB [Entered: 09/08/2025 11:58 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
