SEC v. Robert Miller
| SECURITIES & EXCHANGE COMMISSION |
| ROBERT HILLIS MILLER |
| 25-2334 |
| November 3, 2025 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit |
| Securities, Commodities, Exchange |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 26, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 21 CERTIFICATE OF CONFIDENTIALITY (Local Rule 25(c)) by SEC. Sealing Required: Yes. Description of document referenced by certificate: Appendix to U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission's response brief (volume II), containing material sealed pursuant to the district court's order (Dkt. 118), in particular, a defense exhibit and a motion regarding that exhibit.. [1001950331] [25-2334] David Lisitza [Entered: 03/26/2026 03:33 PM] |
| Filing 20 SEALED SUPPLEMENTAL APPENDIX VOLUME(S) (court access) by SEC . Digital media exhibit volume? Y. Filed Ex parte: Y. [1001950326] [25-2334] David Lisitza [Entered: 03/26/2026 03:28 PM] |
| Filing 19 INFORMAL APPENDIX by SEC. [1001950318] [25-2334] David Lisitza [Entered: 03/26/2026 03:26 PM] |
| Filing 18 BRIEF by SEC. Type of Brief: RESPONSE. . Do any cases pending in this court or the Supreme Court of the United States raise similar issues? YES. Response: Sripetch v. SEC, No. 25-466 (U.S.): whether showing that investors suffered pecuniary harm is a prerequisite to a disgorgement award. This Court need not address this issue here because, as the district court found, investors suffered pecuniary harm.. [1001950316] [25-2334] David Lisitza [Entered: 03/26/2026 03:24 PM] |
Filing 17
ORDER filed granting Motion to extend filing time [ # 15 ] Number of days granted: 7. Any Informal Response Brief due 03/26/2026 Copies to all parties. [1001940092] [25-2334] KY [Entered: 03/09/2026 01:58 PM]
|
| Filing 16 APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL by David D. Lisitza for SEC. [1001940040] [25-2334] David Lisitza [Entered: 03/09/2026 01:09 PM] |
| Filing 15 MOTION by SEC Stephen Silverman to extend filing time for response brief until March 26, 2026.. Date and method of service: 03/09/2026 ecf. [1001939900] [25-2334] Stephen Silverman [Entered: 03/09/2026 11:15 AM] |
|
Filing 14
ORDER filed granting motion to extend filing time [ # 13 ] Number of days granted: 30. Any Informal Response Brief due 03/19/2026 Copies to all parties. [1001912387] [25-2334] RS [Entered: 01/21/2026 10:43 AM]
|
| Filing 13 MOTION by SEC to extend filing time for response brief until March 19, 2026.. Date and method of service: 01/20/2026 ecf. [1001911891] [25-2334] Stephen Silverman [Entered: 01/20/2026 03:22 PM] |
| Filing 12 Attorneys Gregory Robert Bockin, Christopher Bruckmann and John Lucas for SEC terminated from case. Reason for termination: Not participating. [1001904642] [25-2334] CB [Entered: 01/07/2026 01:57 PM] |
|
Filing 11
ORDER filed granting motion to proceed in forma pauperis [ # 10 ]. Copies to all parties. [1001888293] [25-2334] RS [Entered: 12/04/2025 08:55 AM]
|
| Filing 10 IFP-APPLICATION to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24)(court access only) by Robert Hillis Miller. [1001888030] [25-2334] Robert Miller [Entered: 12/03/2025 04:02 PM] |
|
Filing 9
ORDER filed granting Motion to extend filing time [ # 8 ]. Number of days granted: 60. Any Informal Response Brief due 02/17/2026 Copies to all parties. [1001887776] [25-2334] RS [Entered: 12/03/2025 02:14 PM]
|
| Filing 8 MOTION by SEC to extend filing time for response brief until February 17, 2026.. Date and method of service: 12/03/2025 ecf. [1001887489] [25-2334] Stephen Silverman [Entered: 12/03/2025 11:29 AM] |
| Filing 7 INFORMAL OPENING BRIEF by Robert Hillis Miller. [1001886971] [25-2334] Robert Miller [Entered: 12/02/2025 03:34 PM] |
| Filing 6 APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL by Stephen Silverman for SEC. [1001877590] [25-2334] Stephen Silverman [Entered: 11/14/2025 09:52 AM] |
| Filing 5 APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL by Daniel Staroselsky for SEC. [1001874901] [25-2334] Daniel Staroselsky [Entered: 11/10/2025 08:51 AM] |
| Filing 4 RECORD requested from Clerk of Court [1001871708]. Due: 11/17/2025. [25-2334] RS [Entered: 11/03/2025 01:53 PM] |
| Filing 3 INFORMAL BRIEFING ORDER filed.. [1001871704] Informal Opening Brief due 12/01/2025 Informal response brief, if any: 14 days after informal opening brief served. [25-2334] RS [Entered: 11/03/2025 01:50 PM] |
| Filing 2 FEE NOTICE issued to Robert Hills Miller - initial notice. Fee or application to proceed as indigent due 12/03/2025 Originating case number: 8:19-cv-02810-DLB. [1001871701] [25-2334] RS [Entered: 11/03/2025 01:47 PM] |
| Filing 1 Case docketed. Originating case number: 8:19-cv-02810-DLB. Case manager: RSewell. [1001871684] [25-2334] RS [Entered: 11/03/2025 01:24 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: SEC v. Robert Miller | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: SECURITIES & EXCHANGE COMMISSION | |
| Represented By: | Daniel Staroselsky |
| Represented By: | Stephen Silverman |
| Represented By: | David Lisitza |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: ROBERT HILLIS MILLER | |
| Represented By: | Robert Hillis Miller |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
