In re: Zannie Lotharp
| In re: ZANNIE JAY LOTHARP |
| 25-2339 |
| November 4, 2025 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 4, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
ORDER filed granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis [3]. Mailed to: Zannie Lotharp. [1001872413] [25-2339] JN [Entered: 11/04/2025 12:31 PM]
|
| Filing 4 DOCKETING NOTICE issued Re: [ # 2 ] Motion for writ of mandamus Originating case number: 1:19-cr-00448-TDS-1,1:24-cv-00196-TDS-LPA. Mailed to: Zannie Lotharp. [1001872409] [25-2339] JN [Entered: 11/04/2025 12:28 PM] |
| Filing 1 Case docketed. Originating case number: 1:19-cr-00448-TDS-1,1:24-cv-00196-TDS-LPA. Case manager: JNeal. [1001872396] [25-2339] JN [Entered: 11/04/2025 12:19 PM] |
| Filing 3 IFP-APPLICATION to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24)(court access only) by Zannie Jay Lotharp. [1001872407] [25-2339] JN [Entered: 11/04/2025 12:27 PM] |
| Filing 2 Petition for writ of mandamus filed by Zannie Jay Lotharp. [1001872404] [25-2339] JN [Entered: 11/04/2025 12:26 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: In re: Zannie Lotharp | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: In re: ZANNIE JAY LOTHARP | |
| Represented By: | Zannie Jay Lotharp |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
