Anthony James v. John Sonnendecker
| ANTHONY GLENN JAMES |
| JOHN SONNENDECKER, ATF Agent, CHRISTOPHER SCOTT LIETZOW, U.S. Attorney, WILLIAM CROCKETTE, Charleston P.D. - ATF Liasion and JANET CARRA HENDERSON, U.S. Attorney |
| 25-2425 |
| November 26, 2025 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit |
| Prisoner Petitions-Mandamus/Other |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
| Anthony James v. John Sonnendecker |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 27, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
JUDGMENT ORDER filed. Decision: Affirmed. Originating case number: 2:23-cv-03298-TMC. Entered on Docket Date: 04/27/2026. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. Mailed to: Anthony Glenn James. [1001967492] [25-2425] PB [Entered: 04/27/2026 10:39 AM]
|
|
Filing 5
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 2:23-cv-03298-TMC. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. Mailed to: Anthony Glenn James. [1001967477] [25-2425] PB [Entered: 04/27/2026 10:32 AM]
|
|
Filing 4
INFORMAL OPENING BRIEF by Anthony Glenn James. [1001899919] [25-2425] PB [Entered: 12/29/2025 12:37 PM]
|
|
Filing 3
RECORD requested from Clerk of Court [1001884819]. Due: 12/10/2025. [25-2425] PB [Entered: 11/26/2025 01:32 PM]
|
|
Filing 2
INFORMAL BRIEFING ORDER filed. Mailed to: Anthony James. [1001884815] Informal Opening Brief due 12/22/2025. Informal response brief, if any: 14 days after informal opening brief served. [25-2425] PB [Entered: 11/26/2025 01:30 PM]
|
|
Filing 1
Case docketed. Originating case number: 2:23-cv-03298-TMC. Case manager: PBallard. [1001884813] [25-2425] PB [Entered: 11/26/2025 01:29 PM]
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
