US v. Monroe Merrell
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
| MONROE MERRELL |
| 25-4594 |
| November 6, 2025 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 4, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 Rule 42(b) mandate issued. Originating case number: 3:20-cr-00046-GMG-RWT-1. [1001888250] [25-4594] EB [Entered: 12/04/2025 08:22 AM] |
Filing 11
ORDER filed dismissing appeal pursuant to FRAP 42(b) [11]; administratively terminating motion to dismiss appeal [ # 10 ]. Copies to all parties. [1001888246] [25-4594] EB [Entered: 12/04/2025 08:18 AM]
|
| Filing 10 MOTION by US to dismiss appeal [10]. Date and method of service: 12/03/2025 ecf. [1001888132] [25-4594] Eleanor Hurney [Entered: 12/03/2025 04:40 PM] |
| Filing 9 APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL by Eleanor F. Hurney for US. [1001888126] [25-4594] Eleanor Hurney [Entered: 12/03/2025 04:37 PM] |
| Filing 8 Attorney Jennifer Therese Conklin for US in 25-4594, Kimberley DeAnne Crockett for US in 25-4594, Kyle Robert Kane for US in 25-4594, Steven Loew for US in 25-4594, Douglas Sughrue for Monroe Merrell in 25-4594, James A. Swetz for Monroe Merrell in 25-4594 terminated from case. Reason for termination: Not participating. [1001883859] [25-4594] AW [Entered: 11/25/2025 01:05 PM] |
| Filing 7 BRIEFING ORDER filed. No paper copies required unless case has been tentatively calendared or copies otherwise ordered. All filings must comply with # Appendix Pagination & Brief Citation Guide . [1001883853] Opening brief and appendix due 12/30/2025. Response brief due 01/20/2026 [25-4594] AW [Entered: 11/25/2025 01:04 PM] |
| Filing 6 DOCKETING STATEMENT by US.. [1001883746] [25-4594] Randolph Bernard [Entered: 11/25/2025 11:53 AM] |
| Filing 5 APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL by Randolph J. Bernard for US. [1001883740] [25-4594] Randolph Bernard [Entered: 11/25/2025 11:51 AM] |
| Filing 4 DOCKETING NOTICE issued Re: [ # 1 ] criminal case. Originating case number: 3:20-cr-00046-GMG-RWT-1. Mailed to: James A. Swetz. [1001876996] [25-4594] EB [Entered: 11/13/2025 12:56 PM] |
|
Filing 3
ORDER filed appointing Brent Evan Newton for Monroe Merrell in 25-4594. Nunc pro Tunc Date: 11/05/2025. Copies to all parties. Mailed to: James A. Swetz. [1001876989] [25-4594] EB [Entered: 11/13/2025 12:51 PM]
|
| Filing 2 APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL for Monroe Merrell. [1001874026] [25-4594] Brent Newton [Entered: 11/06/2025 03:39 PM] |
| Filing 1 Criminal case docketed. Originating case number: 3:20-cr-00046-GMG-RWT-1. Date notice of appeal filed: 11/05/2025. Case manager: EBorneisen. [1001873758] [25-4594] EB [Entered: 11/06/2025 11:35 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: US v. Monroe Merrell | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA | |
| Represented By: | Randolph John Bernard |
| Represented By: | Eleanor F. Hurney |
| Represented By: | Matthew L. Harvey |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: MONROE MERRELL | |
| Represented By: | Brent Evan Newton |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
