Samuel Schiccatano v. Chadwick Dotson
| SAMUEL HARRY SCHICCATANO |
| CHADWICK DOTSON |
| 25-6028 |
| January 10, 2025 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit |
| Habeas Corpus |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 21, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 INFORMAL OPENING BRIEF by Samuel Harry Schiccatano. [1001725158] [25-6028] David Hargett [Entered: 02/21/2025 10:23 PM] |
Filing 9
ORDER filed granting motion to extend filing time [ # 8 ]. Number of days granted: 15. Informal Opening Brief due 02/21/2025. Copies to all parties. [1001716890] [25-6028] EB [Entered: 02/06/2025 01:11 PM]
|
| Filing 8 MOTION by Samuel Harry Schiccatano to extend filing time for informal opening brief until February 21, 2025.. Date and method of service: 02/06/2025 ecf. [1001716609] [25-6028] David Hargett [Entered: 02/06/2025 11:31 AM] |
| Filing 7 APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL by David B. Hargett for Samuel Harry Schiccatano. [1001716139] [25-6028] David Hargett [Entered: 02/05/2025 07:18 PM] |
| Filing 6 Digital media retained by court. Content: 3 USB flash drives. Vol #1-STATE COURT RECORDS received from Supreme Court of Virginia in record# 161109 and 211200. One USB received. Vol #2-STATE COURT RECORDS received from Court of Appeals of VA in Record #0983-15-4. One USB received. Vol #3- STATE COURT RECORDS RECEIVED from Prince William Circuit Court in case# CL18-1471; one flash drive received. [1001710670] [25-6028] EB [Entered: 01/29/2025 09:01 AM] |
| Filing 5 SUPPLEMENTAL RECORD filed (paper form): Record Part: State Court Records, Volumes Location: 3 volumes. Vol #1-STATE COURT RECORDS received from Supreme Court of Virginia in record# 161109 and 211200. One USB received. Vol #2-STATE COURT RECORDS received from Court of Appeals of VA in Record #0983-15-4. One USB received. Vol #3- STATE COURT RECORDS RECEIVED from Prince William Circuit Court in case# CL18-1471; one flash drive received. [1001710313] [25-6028] EB [Entered: 01/28/2025 03:12 PM] |
| Filing 4 SUPPLEMENTAL RECORD requested from Clerk of Court . What supplement number is this? first. Docket information: state court records. [1001700969] Due: 01/27/2025 [25-6028] EB [Entered: 01/13/2025 12:19 PM] |
| Filing 3 INFORMAL PRELIMINARY BRIEFING ORDER filed. [1001700524] Informal Opening Brief due 02/06/2025 [25-6028] EB [Entered: 01/13/2025 08:57 AM] |
| Filing 2 RECORD requested from Clerk of Court [1001700085]. Due: 01/24/2025. [25-6028] EB [Entered: 01/10/2025 01:29 PM] |
| Filing 1 Habeas corpus appeal docketed. Originating case number: 3:23-cv-00054-HEH. Date notice of appeal filed: 01/09/2025. Case manager: EBorneisen. Did district court rule on COA? Yes. [1001700082] [25-6028] EB [Entered: 01/10/2025 01:27 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Samuel Schiccatano v. Chadwick Dotson | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: SAMUEL HARRY SCHICCATANO | |
| Represented By: | David Bernard Hargett |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: CHADWICK DOTSON | |
| Represented By: | Craig Stallard |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.