Kenneth Newkirk v. Kyle Rosh
| KENNETH H. NEWKIRK |
| KYLE ROSH |
| 25-6105 |
| February 13, 2025 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit |
| Prisoner - Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 7, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 SUPPLEMENT to Motion objecting to terms of the PLRA [ # 11 ] by Kenneth H. Newkirk. Date and method of service: 04/07/2025 US mail. [1001749049] [25-6105]--[Edited 04/11/2025 by AB to modify event and docket text] GMA [Entered: 04/07/2025 03:58 PM] |
Filing 12
ORDER filed denying motion objecting to terms of the PLRA [ # 11 ]. Copies to all parties. Mailed to: Kenneth H. Newkirk. [1001746126] [25-6105] GMA [Entered: 04/01/2025 11:46 AM]
|
| Filing 11 MOTION by Kenneth H. Newkirk objecting to terms of the Prisoner Litigation Reform Act.. Date and method of service: 03/31/2025 US mail. [1001746125] [25-6105] GMA [Entered: 04/01/2025 11:45 AM] |
| Filing 10 MOTION by Kenneth H. Newkirk to refund of filing fees, new trial. Date and method of service: 03/31/2025 US mail. [1001746123] [25-6105] GMA [Entered: 04/01/2025 11:44 AM] |
| Filing 9 MOTION by Kenneth H. Newkirk for bail or release pending appeal. Date and method of service: 03/31/2025 US mail. [1001746120] [25-6105] GMA [Entered: 04/01/2025 11:43 AM] |
| Filing 8 RULE 45 NOTICE issued to Kenneth H. Newkirk re: failure to satisfy fee requirements. Mailed to: Kenneth H. Newkirk. [1001739391] [25-6105] GMA [Entered: 03/19/2025 04:27 PM] |
|
Filing 7
ORDER filed denying Motion for leave to proceed PLRA [5] Copies to all parties. Mailed to: Kenneth H. Newkirk. [1001729464] [25-6105] GMA [Entered: 03/03/2025 12:02 PM]
|
| Filing 6 Notice issued re: [ # 4 ] Motion to transfer. Mailed to: Kenneth H. Newkirk. [1001729461] [25-6105] GMA [Entered: 03/03/2025 12:01 PM] |
| Filing 5 PLRA-APPLICATION (court access only) by Kenneth H. Newkirk. Consent to Payment Form: No; Trust Account Statement: No. [1001728933] [25-6105] GMA [Entered: 02/28/2025 04:45 PM] |
| Filing 4 MOTION by Kenneth H. Newkirk to transfer the appeal to the state court of appeals. Date and method of service: 02/27/2025 US mail. [1001728882] [25-6105] GMA [Entered: 02/28/2025 04:16 PM] |
| Filing 3 RECORD requested from Clerk of Court [1001720423]. Due: 02/27/2025. [25-6105] GMA [Entered: 02/13/2025 09:46 AM] |
| Filing 2 PLRA NOTICE issued to [ Kenneth H. Newkirk ]. Fee due to District Court or PLRA application due to Court of Appeals within 15 days. Mailed to: Kenneth Newkirk. [1001720416] [25-6105] GMA [Entered: 02/13/2025 09:39 AM] |
| Filing 1 Case docketed. Originating case number: 3:24-cv-00223-RCY-MRC. Case manager: GAboutabl. [1001720399] [25-6105] GMA [Entered: 02/13/2025 09:29 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Kenneth Newkirk v. Kyle Rosh | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: KENNETH H. NEWKIRK | |
| Represented By: | Kenneth H. Newkirk |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: KYLE ROSH | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
