Lawrence Charles v. Sean Casey
| LAWRENCE CHARLES |
| SEAN CASEY, Acting Sheriff, City of Alexandria, CAPTAIN GILMORE, Captain, Alexandria Adult Detention Center, LEMUEL HOUSTON, Lieutenant, Alexandria Sheriff's Office, SERGEANT GARNER, Supervisor, Alexandria Sheriff's Office, VICTOR IGNACIO, Sergeant, Alexandria Sheriff's Office, SERGEANT MUNIR, Sergeant, Alexandria Sheriff's Office, DEPUTY STERNS, Deputy, Alexandria Sheriff's Office, DEPUTY HINES, Deputy, Alexandria Sheriff's Office, DEPUTY GRANT, Deputy, Alexandria Sheriff's Office, MYRON ODELL CONTEE, Chaplain, Alexandria Sheriff's Office, HOFFMASTER, Lieutenant, Alexandria Sheriff's Office, CARLOS CANAS, Employee, Alexandria Sheriff's Office, SERGEANT HAGAR, Sergeant, Alexandria Sheriff's Office and CITY OF ALEXANDRIA, Municipal Corporation |
| 25-6237 |
| March 28, 2025 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit |
| Prisoner - Civil Rights |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 2, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 Local Rule 45 mandate issued. Originating case number: 1:24-cv-01799-RDA-LRV. Mailed to: Lawrence Charles. [1001797932] [25-6237] GMA [Entered: 07/02/2025 09:19 AM] |
Filing 11
ORDER filed dismissing appeal for failure to prosecute Copies to all parties. Mailed to: Lawrence Charles. [1001797917] [25-6237] GMA [Entered: 07/02/2025 09:09 AM]
|
| Filing 10 Returned mail received from Lawrence Charles re [ # 2 ] plra Notice , [ # 3 ] briefing order. What action was taken to correct address and re-serve document? Address has since been updated and additional copies were sent to the updated address. [1001780461] [25-6237] GMA [Entered: 06/02/2025 04:15 PM] |
| Filing 9 RULE 45 NOTICE issued to Lawrence Charles re: for failure to satisfy PLRA and informal briefing requirements. Case may be dismissed if default is not cured within 15 days. Mailed to: Lawrence Charles. [1001776704] [25-6237] GMA [Entered: 05/27/2025 12:16 PM] |
Filing 8
ORDER filed granting motion to extend filing time for informal brief [ # 7 ] and PLRA application [ # 7 ], Number of days granted: 30. Informal Opening Brief due 05/21/2025. PLRA application due 05/14/2025. Copies to all parties. Mailed to: Lawrence Charles. [1001753629] [25-6237] GMA [Entered: 04/15/2025 10:51 AM]
|
| Filing 7 MOTION by Lawrence Charles to extend filing time for informal opening brief until unspecified and to extend filing time for PLRA application until unspecified. Date and method of service: 04/14/2025 US mail. [1001753230] [25-6237] GMA [Entered: 04/14/2025 04:35 PM] |
| Filing 6 Letter re: requesting extra copy of informal briefing order by Lawrence Charles. **Copies sent [1001753218] [25-6237] GMA [Entered: 04/14/2025 04:32 PM] |
| Filing 5 Letter re: requesting another copy of informal briefing order by Lawrence Charles . [1001749055] [25-6237] GMA [Entered: 04/07/2025 04:00 PM] |
| Filing 4 RECORD requested from Clerk of Court [1001744254]. Due: 04/11/2025. [25-6237] GMA [Entered: 03/28/2025 11:38 AM] |
| Filing 3 INFORMAL BRIEFING ORDER filed. Mailed to: Lawrence Charles. [1001744250] Informal Opening Brief due 04/21/2025. Informal response brief, if any: 14 days after informal opening brief served. [25-6237] GMA [Entered: 03/28/2025 11:35 AM] |
| Filing 2 PLRA NOTICE issued to [ Lawrence Charles ]. Fee due to District Court or PLRA application due to Court of Appeals within 15 days. Mailed to: Lawrence Charles. [1001744239]. Requested document due 04/14/2025. [25-6237] GMA [Entered: 03/28/2025 11:26 AM] |
| Filing 1 Case docketed. Originating case number: 1:24-cv-01799-RDA-LRV. Case manager: GAboutabl. [1001744233] [25-6237] GMA [Entered: 03/28/2025 11:24 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.