John McKenzie v. R. Brown
| JOHN W. MCKENZIE |
| R. BROWN, B.O.P. and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
| 25-6427 |
| May 21, 2025 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit |
| Habeas Corpus |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 23, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
ORDER filed granting motion to proceed in forma pauperis [6] Copies to all parties. Mailed to: John McKenzie. [1001792448] [25-6427] TF [Entered: 06/23/2025 12:27 PM]
|
| Filing 6 IFP-APPLICATION to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24)(court access only) by John W. McKenzie. [1001792433] [25-6427] TF [Entered: 06/23/2025 12:21 PM] |
| Filing 5 INFORMAL OPENING BRIEF by John W. McKenzie. [1001792422] [25-6427] TF [Entered: 06/23/2025 12:14 PM] |
| Filing 4 RECORD requested from Clerk of Court [1001774131]. Due: 06/04/2025. [25-6427] TF [Entered: 05/21/2025 11:46 AM] |
| Filing 3 INFORMAL BRIEFING ORDER filed. Mailed to: JOHN MCKENZIE.. [1001774117] Informal Opening Brief due 06/16/2025 Informal response brief, if any: 14 days after informal opening brief served. [25-6427] TF [Entered: 05/21/2025 11:38 AM] |
| Filing 2 FEE NOTICE issued to John W. McKenzie - initial notice. Fee or application to proceed as indigent due 06/20/2025 Originating case number: 5:25-cv-00087-JPB-JPM. Mailed to: JOHN MCKENZIE. [1001774098] [25-6427] TF [Entered: 05/21/2025 11:25 AM] |
| Filing 1 Habeas corpus appeal docketed. Originating case number: 5:25-cv-00087-JPB-JPM. Date notice of appeal filed: 05/16/2025. Case manager: TFischer. Did district court rule on COA? N/A. [1001774068] [25-6427] TF [Entered: 05/21/2025 11:15 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
