US v. Errol Baston
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: ERROL RAHNELL TAHEIM BASTON
Case Number: 25-6436
Filed: May 22, 2025
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
August 1, 2025 US v. Errol Baston

Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 17, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 17, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 11 Mandate issued. Referencing: [ # 6 ] unpublished per curiam Opinion , [ # 7 ] Judgment Order. Originating case number: 4:21-cr-00037-BO-1. Mailed to: Errol Baston. [1001843384] [25-6436] SB [Entered: 09/17/2025 10:20 AM]
September 9, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 10 COURT ORDER filed denying Motion for rehearing and rehearing en banc [ # 8 ]. Copies to all parties. Mailed to: Errol Baston. [1001837521] [25-6436] SB [Entered: 09/09/2025 09:25 AM]
August 12, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 9 Mandate temporarily stayed pending ruling on petition for rehearing or rehearing en banc. Mailed to: Errol Baston. [1001821434] [25-6436] SB [Entered: 08/12/2025 01:10 PM]
August 11, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 8 PETITION for rehearing and rehearing en banc by Errol Rahnell Taheim Baston. [1001821433] [25-6436] SB [Entered: 08/12/2025 01:09 PM]
August 1, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 7 JUDGMENT ORDER filed. Decision: Dismissed. Originating case number: 4:21-cr-00037-BO-1. Entered on Docket Date: 08/01/2025. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. Mailed to: Errol Baston. [1001815837] [25-6436] SB [Entered: 08/01/2025 10:22 AM]
August 1, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 6 UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 4:21-cr-00037-BO-1. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. Mailed to: Errol Baston. [1001815774] [25-6436] SB [Entered: 08/01/2025 09:44 AM]
June 10, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 5 APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL by David A. Bragdon for US. [1001784635] [25-6436] David Bragdon [Entered: 06/10/2025 10:00 AM]
June 9, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 4 INFORMAL OPENING BRIEF by Errol Rahnell Taheim Baston. [1001784269] [25-6436] SAB [Entered: 06/09/2025 04:14 PM]
May 22, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 3 RECORD requested from Clerk of Court [1001775395]. Due: 06/05/2025. [25-6436] SAB [Entered: 05/22/2025 04:18 PM]
May 22, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 2 INFORMAL BRIEFING ORDER filed. Mailed to: Errol Baston. [1001775389] Informal Opening Brief due 06/16/2025 Informal response brief, if any: 14 days after informal opening brief served. [25-6436] SAB [Entered: 05/22/2025 04:15 PM]
May 22, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 1 Case docketed. Originating case number: 4:21-cr-00037-BO-1. Case manager: SBatchleor. Date notice of appeal filed: 05/21/2025. [1001775254] [25-6436] SAB [Entered: 05/22/2025 02:28 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: US v. Errol Baston
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Represented By: Lori B. Warlick
Represented By: Aakash Singh
Represented By: David A. Bragdon
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: ERROL RAHNELL TAHEIM BASTON
Represented By: Errol Rahnell Taheim Baston
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?