Lloyd St. Rose v. Baltimore County
| LLOYD ST. ROSE |
| BALTIMORE COUNTY, OFFICER KAWONDA SEARS, DOES 1-9, SERGEANT STOCKSLAGER, MR. HARRIS, MS. SMITH and BALTIMORE COUNTY POLICE DEPARTMENT |
| 25-6638 |
| August 4, 2025 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit |
| Prisoner - Civil Rights |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
| Lloyd St. Rose v. Baltimore County |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 17, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 16
Mandate issued. Referencing: [ # 14 ] unpublished per curiam Opinion, [ # 15 ] Judgment Order. Originating case number: 1:25-cv-00172-ABA. Mailed to: Lloyd St. Rose. [1001895175] [25-6638] TB [Entered: 12/17/2025 09:16 AM]
|
|
Filing 15
JUDGMENT ORDER filed. Decision: Dismissed. Originating case number: 1:25-cv-00172-ABA. Entered on Docket Date: 11/25/2025. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. Mailed to: Lloyd St. Rose. [1001883610] [25-6638] TB [Entered: 11/25/2025 10:44 AM]
|
|
Filing 14
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:25-cv-00172-ABA. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. Mailed to: Lloyd St. Rose. [1001883600] [25-6638] TB [Entered: 11/25/2025 10:42 AM]
|
|
Filing 13
Supplemental INFORMAL OPENING BRIEF by Lloyd St. Rose. [1001847407] [25-6638] TB [Entered: 09/23/2025 01:26 PM]
|
|
Filing 12
ORDER filed granting Motion to extend filing time [ # 11 ] Number of days granted: 30. Supplemental Informal Opening Brief due 10/08/2025. Copies to all parties. Mailed to: St Rose. [1001836681] [25-6638] AW [Entered: 09/08/2025 11:19 AM]
|
|
Filing 11
MOTION by Lloyd St. Rose to extend filing time for a "second" informal opening brief. Date and method of service: 09/04/2025 US mail. [1001835544] [25-6638] TB [Entered: 09/04/2025 04:25 PM]
|
|
Filing 10
SUPPLEMENT to [ # 9 ] informal opening brief by Lloyd St. Rose. [1001835540] [25-6638] TB [Entered: 09/04/2025 04:24 PM]
|
|
Filing 9
INFORMAL OPENING BRIEF by Lloyd St. Rose. [1001835521] [25-6638] TB [Entered: 09/04/2025 04:14 PM]
|
|
Filing 8
RECORD FOLLOW UP NOTICE ISSUED to Clerk of Court. [1001834470] Due: 09/17/2025. [25-6638] TB [Entered: 09/03/2025 01:39 PM]
|
|
Filing 7
RULE 45 NOTICE issued to Lloyd St. Rose re: failure to file informal brief. Mailed to: Lloyd St. Rose. [1001834468] [25-6638] TB [Entered: 09/03/2025 01:35 PM]
|
|
Filing 6
ORDER filed granting Motion for leave to proceed PLRA [5]. Fee Amount: $605. Name and Prisoner Number: Lloyd St. Rose, #471803. Copies to all parties. Mailed to: Warden, Attn: Accounting at Baltimore County Detention and Lloyd St. Rose. [1001830744] [25-6638] TB [Entered: 08/27/2025 11:07 AM]
|
|
Filing 5
PLRA-APPLICATION (court access only) by Lloyd St. Rose. Consent to Payment Form: Yes; Trust Account Statement: Yes. [1001830040] [25-6638] TB [Entered: 08/26/2025 01:52 PM]
|
|
Filing 4
RECORD requested from Clerk of Court [1001816944]. Due: 08/18/2025. [25-6638] TB [Entered: 08/04/2025 03:41 PM]
|
|
Filing 3
INFORMAL BRIEFING ORDER filed. Mailed to: Lloyd St. Rose. [1001816939] Informal Opening Brief due 08/28/2025. Informal response brief, if any: 14 days after informal opening brief served. [25-6638] TB [Entered: 08/04/2025 03:37 PM]
|
|
Filing 2
PLRA NOTICE issued to Lloyd St. Rose. Fee due to District Court or PLRA application due to Court of Appeals within 15 days. Mailed to: Lloyd St. Rose. [1001816890]. Requested document due 08/28/2025. [25-6638] TB [Entered: 08/04/2025 02:58 PM]
|
|
Filing 1
Case docketed. Originating case number: 1:25-cv-00172-ABA. Case manager: TBarton. [1001816886] [25-6638] TB [Entered: 08/04/2025 02:56 PM]
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
