Richard Forbes v. Warden William Bailey
Plaintiff: RICHARD J. FORBES
Defendant: WARDEN WILLIAM BAILEY, ALYSIA KEENE, RN, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER SAMUEL LOPEZ and CORRECTIONAL OFFICER MARC JONES
Case Number: 25-6937
Filed: October 31, 2025
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
June 30, 2026 Richard Forbes v. Warden William Bailey

Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 9, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 9, 2026 Filing 15 DOCUMENT by Richard J. Forbes. [1001941837] [25-6937] JN [Entered: 03/11/2026 12:54 PM]
February 9, 2026 Filing 14 INFORMAL RESPONSE BRIEF by William Bailey, Marc Jones and Samuel Lopez. [1001923962] [25-6937] Nicole Young [Entered: 02/09/2026 04:14 PM]
February 9, 2026 Filing 13 Docket correction requested from William Bailey and Samuel Lopez. Re: [ # 12 ] brief. Access to brief has been restricted to case participants. Mailed to: Richard Forbes. [1001923837] [25-6937] TW [Entered: 02/09/2026 03:20 PM]
February 9, 2026 Filing 12 (ENTRY RESTRICTED) BRIEF by Marc Jones, William Bailey and Samuel Lopez. Type of Brief: OPENING/RESPONSE.. Do any cases pending in this court or the Supreme Court of the United States raise similar issues? NO.. [1001923696] [25-6937]--[Edited 02/09/2026 by TW, document struck see ECF 14] Nicole Young [Entered: 02/09/2026 02:08 PM]
January 26, 2026 Filing 11 APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL by Nicole R. Young for William Bailey, Marc Jones and Samuel Lopez. [1001915750] [25-6937] Nicole Young [Entered: 01/26/2026 04:08 PM]
January 14, 2026 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER filed extending filing time for informal response brief until February 9, 2026. Number of days granted: 25. Copies to all parties. [1001908884] [25-6937] TO [Entered: 01/14/2026 10:02 AM]
January 14, 2026 Filing 9 RULE 46 NOTICE issued to Nicole Ring Young for William Bailey, Samuel Lopez and Marc Jones for filing of appearance form.. Requested document due 01/29/2026. Mailed to: Richard Forbes. [1001908806] [25-6937] TW [Entered: 01/14/2026 09:22 AM]
January 12, 2026 Filing 8 MOTION by William Bailey, Samuel Lopez and Marc Jones to extend filing time for informal response brief.. Date and method of service: 01/12/2026 US mail. [1001906943] [25-6937] Nicole Young [Entered: 01/12/2026 09:57 AM]
November 26, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER filed granting Motion for leave to proceed PLRA [6]. Fee Amount: $605. Name and Prisoner Number: Richard J. Forbes, #480666. Copies to all parties. [1001884951] [25-6937] JN [Entered: 11/26/2025 03:04 PM]
November 26, 2025 Filing 6 PLRA-APPLICATION (court access only) by Richard J. Forbes. Consent to Payment Form: Yes; Trust Account Statement: No. [1001884946] [25-6937] JN [Entered: 11/26/2025 03:03 PM]
November 26, 2025 Filing 5 INFORMAL OPENING BRIEF by Richard J. Forbes. [1001884945] [25-6937] JN [Entered: 11/26/2025 03:02 PM]
October 31, 2025 Filing 4 RECORD requested from Clerk of Court [1001870744]. Due: 11/14/2025. [25-6937] JN [Entered: 10/31/2025 11:43 AM]
October 31, 2025 Filing 3 INFORMAL BRIEFING ORDER filed. [1001870738] Informal Opening Brief due 11/24/2025. Informal response brief, if any: 14 days after informal opening brief served. Mailed to: Richard Forbes. [25-6937] JN [Entered: 10/31/2025 11:42 AM]
October 31, 2025 Filing 2 PLRA NOTICE issued to [ Richard J. Forbes ]. Fee due to District Court or PLRA application due to Court of Appeals within 15 days. [1001870736]. Requested document due 11/17/2025. Mailed to: Richard Forbes. [25-6937] JN [Entered: 10/31/2025 11:40 AM]
October 31, 2025 Filing 1 Case docketed. Originating case number: 1:24-cv-02252-BAH. Case manager: JNeal. [1001870731] [25-6937] JN [Entered: 10/31/2025 11:36 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Richard Forbes v. Warden William Bailey
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: RICHARD J. FORBES
Represented By: Richard J. Forbes
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: WARDEN WILLIAM BAILEY
Represented By: Nicole Ring Young
Represented By: Sharon Conners
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: ALYSIA KEENE, RN
Represented By: Megan Trocki Mantzavinos
Represented By: Jason Richard Engel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: CORRECTIONAL OFFICER SAMUEL LOPEZ
Represented By: Nicole Ring Young
Represented By: Sharon Conners
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: CORRECTIONAL OFFICER MARC JONES
Represented By: Nicole Ring Young
Represented By: Sharon Conners
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?