Mack Davis v. Madisen
| MACK ALLEN DAVIS |
| MADISEN, Housing Officer, OFC. LONG, Housing Officer, LIEUTENANT SHOMP, OFC. REYES, Housing Officer, CIANCIOLO, WILLIAMS, JENIFER, Nurse Practitioner, LAWSON, Over Medical and DR. GARNER |
| 25-7053 |
| December 18, 2025 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit |
| Prison Condition |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 5, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 18 Notice issued re: [ # 17 ] letter. Mailed to: Mack Allen Davis. [1001973786] [25-7053] KS [Entered: 05/05/2026 04:54 PM] |
| Filing 17 Letter re: mail and next steps by Mack Allen Davis. [1001973778] [25-7053] KS [Entered: 05/05/2026 04:48 PM] |
| Filing 16 RESPONSE/ANSWER by Mack Allen Davis to Motion to dismiss appeal [ # 12 ]. [1001939462] [25-7053] KS [Entered: 03/06/2026 03:13 PM] |
| Filing 15 Local Rule 45 mandate issued. Originating case number: 8:25-cv-02548-JDA-WSB. Mailed to: Mack Allen Davis. [1001938287] [25-7053] KS [Entered: 03/05/2026 10:56 AM] |
Filing 14
ORDER filed dismissing appeal for failure to prosecute. Copies to all parties. Mailed to: Mack Allen Davis. [1001938286] [25-7053] KS [Entered: 03/05/2026 10:55 AM]
|
| Filing 13 NOTICE ISSUED to Mack Allen Davis requesting response to Motion to dismiss appeal [ # 12 ]. Response due 02/23/2026. [1001926225] Mailed to: Mack Allen Davis. [25-7053] KS [Entered: 02/12/2026 11:02 AM] |
| Filing 12 MOTION by Madisen to dismiss appeal [12]. Date and method of service: 02/11/2026 US mail. [1001925974] [25-7053] James Johnson [Entered: 02/11/2026 06:12 PM] |
| Filing 11 RULE 45 NOTICE issued to Mack Allen Davis re: failure to satisfy fee requirements under PLRA Case may be dismissed if default is not cured within 15 days. Mailed to: Mack Allen Davis. [1001917748] [25-7053] RP [Entered: 01/29/2026 01:26 PM] |
| Filing 10 PLRA-APPLICATION (court access only) by Mack Allen Davis. Consent to Payment Form: No; Trust Account Statement: No. [1001917387] [25-7053] RP [Entered: 01/29/2026 09:38 AM] |
| Filing 9 INFORMAL OPENING BRIEF by Mack Allen Davis. [1001917386] [25-7053] RP [Entered: 01/29/2026 09:37 AM] |
| Filing 8 CHANGE OF ADDRESS Notice by Mack Allen Davis. [1001917358] [25-7053] RP [Entered: 01/29/2026 09:23 AM] |
| Filing 7 RULE 45 NOTICE issued to Mack Allen Davis re: failure to satisfy PLRA and informal briefing requirements. Case may be dismissed if default is not cured within 15 days. Mailed to: Mack Allen Davis. [1001912974] [25-7053] KS [Entered: 01/21/2026 04:01 PM] |
| Filing 6 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Madisen. Was any question on Disclosure Form answered yes? No [1001907098] [25-7053] James Johnson [Entered: 01/12/2026 11:08 AM] |
| Filing 5 APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL by J. Matthew Johnson for Madisen. [1001907095] [25-7053] James Johnson [Entered: 01/12/2026 11:04 AM] |
| Filing 4 RECORD requested from Clerk of Court. Due: 01/02/2026. [1001896165] [25-7053] KS [Entered: 12/18/2025 10:53 AM] |
| Filing 3 INFORMAL BRIEFING ORDER filed. Mailed to: Mack Allen Davis. [1001896162] Informal Opening Brief due 01/12/2026. Informal response brief, if any: 14 days after informal opening brief served. [25-7053] KS [Entered: 12/18/2025 10:49 AM] |
| Filing 2 PLRA NOTICE issued to [ Mack Allen Davis ]. Fee due to District Court or PLRA application due to Court of Appeals within 15 days. Mailed to: Mack Allen Davis. [1001896158]. Requested document due 01/02/2026. [25-7053] KS [Entered: 12/18/2025 10:48 AM] |
| Filing 1 Case docketed. Originating case number: 8:25-cv-02548-JDA-WSB. Case manager: KStump. [1001896154] [25-7053] KS [Entered: 12/18/2025 10:46 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
