David Willis v. Todd Sponseller
Plaintiff: DAVID KEITH WILLIS
Defendant: JUDGE TODD SPONSELLER, individually and in his official capacity, LAURA WILLIS and FRANKLIN COUNTY PROTHONOTARY'S OFFICE
Case Number: 26-1103
Filed: February 2, 2026
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
July 28, 2026 David Willis v. Todd Sponseller

Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 28, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 28, 2026 Opinion or Order Filing 8 JUDGMENT ORDER filed. Decision: Affirmed. Originating case number: 1:25-cv-00624-TDS-JLW. Entered on Docket Date: 07/28/2026. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [1002023135] [26-1103] SB [Entered: 07/28/2026 09:31 AM]
July 28, 2026 Opinion or Order Filing 7 UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:25-cv-00624-TDS-JLW. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [1002023128] [26-1103] SB [Entered: 07/28/2026 09:28 AM]
February 13, 2026 Opinion or Order Filing 6 INFORMAL OPENING BRIEF by David Keith Willis. [1001926860] [26-1103] David Willis [Entered: 02/13/2026 09:36 AM]
February 3, 2026 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER filed granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis [2]. Copies to all parties. Mailed to: David K. Willis. [1001920101] [26-1103] SB [Entered: 02/03/2026 12:36 PM]
February 2, 2026 Opinion or Order Filing 4 RECORD requested from Clerk of Court [1001919489]. Due: 02/17/2026. [26-1103] SB [Entered: 02/02/2026 02:48 PM]
February 2, 2026 Opinion or Order Filing 3 INFORMAL BRIEFING ORDER filed. Mailed to: David Willis. [1001919480] Informal Opening Brief due 02/26/2026. Informal response brief, if any: 14 days after informal opening brief served. [26-1103] SB [Entered: 02/02/2026 02:45 PM]
February 2, 2026 Opinion or Order Filing 2 IFP APPLICATION transferred from district court (court access only). [1001919477] [26-1103] SB [Entered: 02/02/2026 02:44 PM]
February 2, 2026 Opinion or Order Filing 1 Case docketed. Originating case number: 1:25-cv-00624-TDS-JLW. Case manager: SBatchleor. [1001919470] [26-1103] SB [Entered: 02/02/2026 02:41 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: David Willis v. Todd Sponseller
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: DAVID KEITH WILLIS
Represented By: David Keith Willis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: JUDGE TODD SPONSELLER, individually and in his official capacity
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: LAURA WILLIS
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: FRANKLIN COUNTY PROTHONOTARY'S OFFICE
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?