Yasmani Rubio v. City of Alexandria, Virginia
| YASMANI GURRI RUBIO |
| THE CITY OF ALEXANDRIA, VIRGINIA, JUSTIN MICHAEL WILSON, Mayor in his individual capacity, ADP CODY SAVAGE, in his individual capacity, ADP MICHAEL ROCHE, in his individual capacity, ADP ROBERT POND, in his individual capacity, ADP JAMIE BRIDGEMAN, in his individual capacity and CHIEF OF ALEXANDRIA POLICE, in his individual capacity |
| 26-1163 |
| February 17, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit |
| Other Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 23, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 INFORMAL OPENING BRIEF by Yasmani Gurri Rubio. [1001932001] [26-1163] Yasmani Rubio [Entered: 02/23/2026 02:16 PM] |
Filing 5
ORDER filed deferring action on Motion to appoint/assign counsel filed by Appellant Yasmani Gurri Rubio [ # 4 ]. Copies to all parties. [1001928368] [26-1163] RP [Entered: 02/17/2026 02:08 PM]
|
| Filing 4 MOTION by Yasmani Gurri Rubio to MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL.. Date and method of service: 02/17/2026 ecf. [1001928337] [26-1163] Yasmani Rubio [Entered: 02/17/2026 01:52 PM] |
| Filing 3 RECORD requested from Clerk of Court [1001927994]. Due: 03/03/2026. [26-1163] RP [Entered: 02/17/2026 10:13 AM] |
| Filing 2 INFORMAL BRIEFING ORDER filed.. [1001927991] Informal Opening Brief due 03/13/2026. Informal response brief, if any: 14 days after informal opening brief served. [26-1163] RP [Entered: 02/17/2026 10:11 AM] |
| Filing 1 Case docketed. Originating case number: 3:24-cv-00193-DJN. Case manager: RPhillips. [1001927982] [26-1163] RP [Entered: 02/17/2026 10:09 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
