Joshua Harrell v. Andrew Coop
| JOSHUA HARRELL, they/them/their/theirs |
| ANDREW COOP, SANDEEP DEVABHAKTHUNI, a/k/a Dr. Dev, STEVEN FLETCHER, PATRICIA ROSS, JAMES TROVATO, DOES 1-100 and UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND SCHOOL OF PHARMACY |
| 26-1544 |
| May 1, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit |
| Other Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 29, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 Local Rule 45 mandate issued. Originating case number: 1:24-cv-00104-MJM. Mailed to: Joshua Harrell. [1002005673] [26-1544] MP [Entered: 06/29/2026 02:15 PM] |
Filing 6
ORDER filed dismissing appeal for failure to prosecute. Copies to all parties. Mailed to: Joshua Harrell. [1002005665] [26-1544] MP [Entered: 06/29/2026 02:10 PM]
|
| Filing 5 RULE 45 NOTICE issued to Joshua Harrell re: failure to file informal brief. Mailed to: Joshua Harrell. [1001989073] [26-1544] MP [Entered: 06/02/2026 10:16 AM] |
| Filing 4 APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL by Jennifer DeRose, Esq. for Andrew Coop, Sandeep Devabhakthuni, Does 1-100, Steven Fletcher, Patricia Ross and James Trovato. [1001977220] [26-1544] Jennifer DeRose [Entered: 05/12/2026 11:21 AM] |
| Filing 3 RECORD requested from Clerk of Court [1001971605]. Due: 05/15/2026. [26-1544] MP [Entered: 05/01/2026 01:53 PM] |
| Filing 2 INFORMAL BRIEFING ORDER filed. Mailed to: Joshua Harrell. [1001971602] Informal Opening Brief due 05/26/2026. Informal response brief, if any: 14 days after informal opening brief served. [26-1544] MP [Entered: 05/01/2026 01:51 PM] |
| Filing 1 Case docketed. Originating case number: 1:24-cv-00104-MJM. Case manager: MPowers. [1001971587] [26-1544] MP [Entered: 05/01/2026 01:43 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
