Juanita Claiborne v. David Steiner
| JUANITA CLAIBORNE |
| DAVID STEINER, Postmaster General, U.S. Postal Service, BRIAN WILLIAMS, In their Individual and Official Capacity, DANTE CARLISLE, In their Individual and Official Capacity, KENDRA MACON, In their Individual and Official Capacity, EDWARD BENSON, In their Individual and Official Capacity, MARCUS TOLLIVER, In their Individual and Official Capacity, VONDA TOLLOVER NELSON, In their Individual and Official Capacity, LARRY LIGHTFOOT, In their Individual and Official Capacity, DONALD HORDGE, In their Individual and Official Capacity, TONZA J. EXUM, In their Individual and Official Capacity, TANYA ROANE, In their Individual and Official Capacity, JENNIFER D. SZABO, In their Individual and Official Capacity, MARYANA SWINT, In their Individual and Official Capacity, JEROME COSBY, In their Individual and Official Capacity, SANDY TERRY, a/k/a Snoop, In their Individual and Official Capacity and ROBERT MORINA |
| 26-1612 |
| May 18, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit |
| Jobs |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 18, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 RECORD requested from Clerk of Court [1001980592]. Due: 06/01/2026. [26-1612] JN [Entered: 05/18/2026 12:57 PM] |
| Filing 2 INFORMAL BRIEFING ORDER filed. [1001980590] Informal Opening Brief due 06/11/2026. Informal response brief, if any: 14 days after informal opening brief served. Mailed to: Juanita Claiborne. [26-1612] JN [Entered: 05/18/2026 12:55 PM] |
| Filing 1 Case docketed. Originating case number: 3:24-cv-00333-RCY. Case manager: JNeal. [1001980586] [26-1612] JN [Entered: 05/18/2026 12:51 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
