Krystle Ragin v. Pete Hegseth
Plaintiff: KRYSTLE RAGIN
Defendant: PETE HEGSETH, Secretary of War and GEN. JOSHUA RUDD, NSA Director
Case Number: 26-1701
Filed: June 3, 2026
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Jobs
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 20, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 20, 2026 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER filed extending briefing order deadlines. Opening brief and appendix due 10/02/2026. Response brief due 11/02/2026. No paper copies required unless case has been tentatively calendared or copies otherwise ordered. Copies to all parties. [1002017648] [26-1701] RP [Entered: 07/20/2026 12:12 PM]
June 23, 2026 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER filed updating briefing schedule. Opening brief and appendix due 09/02/2026. Response brief due 10/02/2026. No paper copies required unless case has been tentatively calendared or copies otherwise ordered. Copies to all parties. [1002001572] [26-1701] AW [Entered: 06/23/2026 10:07 AM]
June 22, 2026 Filing 8 APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL by AUSA Beatrice Thomas for Joshua Rudd and Pete Hegseth. [1002000546] [26-1701] Beatrice Thomas [Entered: 06/22/2026 11:24 AM]
June 22, 2026 Filing 7 Initial mediation conference scheduled. [1002000232] [26-1701] WTF [Entered: 06/22/2026 09:04 AM]
June 17, 2026 Filing 6 DOCKETING STATEMENT by Krystle Ragin.. [1001999250] [26-1701] Stephanie Rapp-Tully [Entered: 06/17/2026 05:47 PM]
June 17, 2026 Filing 5 APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL by Stephanie Rapp-Tully for Krystle Ragin. [1001999242] [26-1701] Stephanie Rapp-Tully [Entered: 06/17/2026 05:01 PM]
June 17, 2026 Filing 4 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Krystle Ragin. Was any question on Disclosure Form answered yes? No [1001999236] [26-1701] Stephanie Rapp-Tully [Entered: 06/17/2026 04:54 PM]
June 3, 2026 Filing 3 BRIEFING ORDER filed. No paper copies required unless case has been tentatively calendared or copies otherwise ordered. All filings must comply with # Appendix Pagination & Brief Citation Guide . [1001989885] Opening Brief and Appendix due 07/13/2026. Response Brief due 08/12/2026 [26-1701] AW [Entered: 06/03/2026 10:39 AM]
June 3, 2026 Filing 2 DOCKETING NOTICE issued Re: [ # 1 ] case. Originating case number: 1:24-cv-03365-MJM. [1001989883] [26-1701] AW [Entered: 06/03/2026 10:37 AM]
June 3, 2026 Filing 1 Case docketed. Originating case number: 1:24-cv-03365-MJM. Case manager: AWalker. [1001989874] [26-1701] AW [Entered: 06/03/2026 10:35 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Krystle Ragin v. Pete Hegseth
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: KRYSTLE RAGIN
Represented By: Stephanie Rapp-Tully
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: PETE HEGSETH, Secretary of War
Represented By: Beatrice Campbell Thomas
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: GEN. JOSHUA RUDD, NSA Director
Represented By: Beatrice Campbell Thomas
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?