In re: Charles Johnson
| In re: CHARLES ELOYS JOHNSON, a/k/a Adam White |
| 26-1728 |
| June 9, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 9, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 DOCKETING NOTICE issued Re: [ # 3 ] Motion for writ of mandamus. Originating case number: 2:15-cr-00386-RMG-1. Mailed to: Charles Johnson. [1001993525] [26-1728] PB [Entered: 06/09/2026 10:19 AM] |
| Filing 2 FEE NOTICE issued to Charles Eloys Johnson - initial notice. Fee or application to proceed as indigent due 06/24/2026. Originating case number: 2:15-cr-00386-RMG-1. Mailed to: Charles Johnson. [1001993509] [26-1728] PB [Entered: 06/09/2026 10:12 AM] |
| Filing 1 Case docketed. Originating case number: 2:15-cr-00386-RMG-1. Case manager: PBallard. [1001993483] [26-1728] PB [Entered: 06/09/2026 10:00 AM] |
| Filing 3 Petition for writ of mandamus filed by Charles Eloys Johnson. [1001993521] [26-1728] PB [Entered: 06/09/2026 10:17 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: In re: Charles Johnson | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: In re: CHARLES ELOYS JOHNSON, a/k/a Adam White | |
| Represented By: | Charles Eloys Johnson |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
